well based on this?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eLG9TmRt0NM
2006-08-23 02:28:15
·
answer #1
·
answered by tough as hell 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
Probably So !!! The U.S. wants (Iran) to have Nuclear Weapons, so that they can (Justify) creating another (War) so that the Bush Administration can have another (Funnel) to hide all of the damn (Monies) that they have so (Irresponsibly) put into (Irresponsible Hands) like (Dirty Contractors) have already shown on the (News) about miss handled funds from the U.S. Government. They lied about Weapons of mass destruction w/Iraq, Now that the Bush Admin has found Iran to announce that they have such (Nuclear Capabilities). I really believe that the Bush Admin is looking for a Country, such as (Iran) to be one of the Countries to (Hide all of the ire (Wrong Doings) by Dirty Book Keeping. This Bush Admin is the most Costliest President not only as an American President but any President of any Country. I predict that one day, the Bush Admin will have to answer to (Congress) about where all of the Monies have gone, & Iran is more than likely one of those Countries that they will use as an (Escape Goat) for funnelling (War Money). By the way, Russia helped Iran w/theire Nukes, & America sponsored it. Have a nice day !!! rumeoui !
2006-08-23 03:08:00
·
answer #2
·
answered by rumeoui 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
I think this country is spread thin enough as it is. We can't be fighting all of these wars at the same time. If they want to go to war with Iran, first they need to end the wars they having going on right now.
2006-08-23 03:19:24
·
answer #3
·
answered by Lilith Phoenix 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Seal there border with a multi national force apply heavy sanctions. This is far more difficult with the Hezbollah situation and i think that was the objective. Distract the world so that their borders are more difficult to seal.Iraq to their west and Afghanistan to their east. This has been the plan since post 9/11. One of the main objective was to keep nukes out of Iran's hands. Strategically Iran is in trouble. For years we've known their timetable to achieve nuclear proliferation. If Iraq war went better Iran would be far from being in a position to proliferate these weapons.Hence their steadfast support for Hezbollah and the flooding into Iraq of insurgents to fight us there. It has been a clever play on there part . The chess game is not over yet. It very well could end with the use of nuclear weapons. Whether we remain there or not.
2006-08-23 02:34:42
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
Hopefully not, based on how things are going in Iraq.
While they may have similar names and be side by side, Iran has three times Iraq's population. It is a country of 70 million people. The US does not have the means to control such an area.
2006-08-23 02:34:16
·
answer #5
·
answered by kheserthorpe 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
NO!
USA should not even have declared war on Iraq. Look at what it has done. Chaos in the middle east, followed by war against Lebanon.
War should never be an answer. Even the UN did not support the war and yet USA declared it.
Innocent people should not die just because the leaders do not agree. We have the right to live.
2006-08-23 02:39:04
·
answer #6
·
answered by shopaholic 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
Well, Iran has oil, right? So what are the chances that the U.S. attacks an oil rich country that doesn't possess WMD's (such as Iraq or Iran) as opposed to a country without oil that does possess WMD's (such as North Korea)?
What in the recent history does tell you that the U.S. will NOT attack? Our country is being kidnapped by a fear-mongering, war-drumming junta of the worst kind. OF COURSE THEY WILL ATTACK IRAN.
2006-08-23 02:33:08
·
answer #7
·
answered by The answer man 4
·
1⤊
2⤋
If you listen to Iran"s President , he desires WAR , to bring about a world wide Islamic State .
They back all the terrorists groups with weapons and money and they are trying to get NUKES .
We'll probably give them the first shot , or Europe will cry , then we'll blow the snot out of them ( Europe will ***** ) and leave them in tents .
Forget rebuilding them , just destroy them .
Then Europe will rebuild them and we'll have to do it all over again in 20 yrs
2006-08-23 02:37:39
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
WELL ,,,,,,, let america try it once again ,,,,
are you idiot , people???? why on earth america has the right to invade or start a war with any country ?
ain't iran full of innocent people ? who lives their lives like any other innocent people? like american ? europian ? ... why to kill others ,,, will american be happy to give oil to israel via killiong thousands of others ? I mean , give me one clear reason ....... WHY SHOULD AMERICA DO ALL THIS SH*T AROUND THE WORLD ?
2006-08-23 03:13:36
·
answer #9
·
answered by abooodi 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
No. US should not. I think that Iran will eventually do something stupid, and then Israel will stomp a mud hole in their butt holes.
2006-08-23 02:30:24
·
answer #10
·
answered by John R 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
LOL I agree with gyspy totally, best answer I heard in a long time.
2006-08-23 02:53:08
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋