2006-08-23 02:05:33 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
Yes, he'd be armed though he's armless!
2006-08-23 02:08:08 · answer #1 · answered by johnavaro 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, if a man with no arms has a gun om his person, he is armed.
2006-08-23 21:26:32 · answer #2 · answered by persnickety1022 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes he would because even though his arms are gone he could still hold the gun with his feet and then he would be armed
2006-08-24 21:02:40 · answer #3 · answered by Brandon G 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
he has no arm but has a gun.?? then, that gun has to be on his waist.now, that sounds similar to a policeman who carries a gun but always in its gun holster.since a policeman is considered an armed officer, therefore this handicap guy is unfortunately, also, is considered arm.
2006-08-23 09:21:35 · answer #4 · answered by blitzdom 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes he would be.
He has a gun which is a weapon although he cannot use it, someone else can or he can even use his legs which i dont know how.
The "Armed" in this case has nothing to do with hands.
2006-08-23 09:09:24 · answer #5 · answered by gdfella2 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes, all he has to do is say he has a gun and he is considered armed.
2006-08-23 09:07:38 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
you mean like a circus freak show man with no arms and a gun?
2006-08-23 09:07:34 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Technically, he'd be an armed armless man.
And I wouldn't stand too close to him.
2006-08-23 09:15:35 · answer #8 · answered by Jazmanana 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
good question! But if he had no arms im sure theyd give him fake arms to work with so maybe he might be: fake-armed?
2006-08-23 09:10:27 · answer #9 · answered by blah 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
armed as in occupation of a weapons, yes.
armed as in having two arms, no.
2006-08-23 09:09:17 · answer #10 · answered by wlv 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋