http://www.popularmechanics.com/science/defense/1227842.html?page=6&c=y
This site has often been suggested as a rebuttal to the 9/11 Government Conspiracy and the thousands of Web links clearly showing that all is not as it seems on 9/11. To be fair to those that suggest it I decided to read it from 1st page to the Last. It is clear to me that it is a mish mash of Government explanations, dubious proffessionals who clearly are seeking some Governmental gratification and frankly bad Journalism and Editorials.
I therefore ask, can a sane human being really believe this rubbish?
2006-08-23 01:45:06 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Unfortunately many in power rely on the masses remaining sheep and not questioning and demanding answers. A mish mash of government explanations is something we should not take lightly.......they had all the evidence and were the only ones who had unrestricted access to it. There is no excuse for what is going on here. Mind you then they make a 9/11 movie..you know why?...... because they hope we will only remember the terror and be fearful while they take our freedom in the name of national security. I mean seriously building 7 collapsing is a blatant lie!!!! Your thoughts are not unusual.....demand answers and seek knowledge! Look up the following.....False Flags, infowars, Alex Jones/GCN radio to start. Happy researching!
2006-08-23 02:00:18 · answer #1 · answered by Miss J 3 · 1⤊ 3⤋
It sounds like you don't have an open mind about this. But let's assume that the US gov't wanted to start a war or wars in the middle east. There is evidence that Rumsfeld and Cheny wanted to bomb Iraq from the early days of the administration, 7 or 8 months before 9-11. These guys knew there had been terrorist strikes aimed at US interests, and that Sadaam was bellicose and uncooperative. Therefore, they knew it was just a matter of time until some event happened that would justify a relaliation against Iraq. 9-11 gave them the opportunity. No conspiracy by the US was needed. But of course, 9-11 WAS the result of a conspiracy composed of Al Qaeda members, mostly Saudis.
2006-08-23 01:48:15 · answer #2 · answered by ? 5 · 5⤊ 0⤋
The interest thing about that article is that it was only published after the Hirsh company thoroughly evicerated the editorial and publishing staff, and then hired the cousin of Homeland Security director Chertoff to write the piece.
They've just released a book on the same topic that expands upon the same government deceptions and ommissions.
With that in mind, the original "Jersey Girls" who fought the White House for over a year just to get an investigation into 9/11 are releasing a movie in the next few weeks regarding the multidude of remaining unanswered questions surrounding the events. Their husbands died in the attacks and they are still highly concerned because 70% of the questions that they presented to the Commission went unanswered.
Here is a link to the movies site, which has locations for initial showings:
http://www.911pressfortruth.com/
2006-08-23 02:07:05 · answer #3 · answered by shorebreak 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Conspiracy theories are rarely proven to be true. If anyone has seen the documentary on Court TV titled "On Native Soil," they will tell you that there were a whole myriad of screw-ups that day and for years leading up to 9/11. It was a major mistake made by the Clinton and Bush administrations to ignore the signs and warnings. The 911 dispatchers were putting people on hold. The fighter jets were scrambled too late and in the wrong direction. The only one who acknowledged the fact that the government had screwed up was the former chairman of the government's counter-terrorism department. As for the conspiracies, they are ridiculous. I just can't imagine our leaders planning and carrying out such a despicable attack on their own people.
2006-08-23 02:00:14 · answer #4 · answered by bluejacket8j 4 · 3⤊ 2⤋
i'm prone to assert 80% sane and 20% insane for how else do we clarify the numerous hazards we take? If we are ninety 9% sane, we can never dare project into the unknown (like bypass to the Moon, case in point).
2016-11-05 10:52:19 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You are refuting Popular Mechanics? Whats next? National Geographic?
But I bet trueconspiracytheories.com gets your seal of approval right, humanist?
2006-08-23 02:58:53 · answer #6 · answered by smitty031 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yes, I believe in these facts, there is no conspiracy. That was a work of terrorists. That's all!
2006-08-23 02:02:48 · answer #7 · answered by Danny B 3 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Find a sane human and ask them. Be prepared for a LONG search.
2006-08-23 01:51:17 · answer #8 · answered by Michael B 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
I try to keep an open mind, and I'm still not certain what actually happened, I'm not sure that we ever will. Some people have a hard time accepting facts and logic especially when it contradicts what they firmly believe, similar to the NEOCON masses still supporting DUH-bya and his failed policies both international and domestic.
2006-08-23 01:50:37 · answer #9 · answered by Dr.Feelgood 5 · 1⤊ 4⤋
How can anyone swallow the garbage and rubbish that the fringe-element, crackpot theorists have vomited forth?
2006-08-23 01:48:38 · answer #10 · answered by Albannach 6 · 3⤊ 1⤋