Will his wife find the picture to prove/disprove he was not in Boulder Colorado at Christmas in 1996 when she was murdered? Or is he doing this just to make a name for himself and get in the history books?
2006-08-23 00:12:26 · 12 answers · asked by JBWPLGCSE 5 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
I don't know for sure if he did it or not, but he is definitely a "unique" person. He does seem to know some details which were not published in the media. Something is not "normal" about this man and this whole thing. Maybe he was there as an accomplice, or knows the person who committed this horrifying crime. It will be interesting to see how this is all going to play out. He is definitely a creepy character. The first time I saw him on the news I got the same sick feeling in the pit of my stomach that I got when I was a kid and Charles Manson was on trial, and his face was on every tv screen and newspaper. Yuck.
2006-08-23 00:24:23 · answer #1 · answered by Sue F 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i've got have been given no longer seen any of the fairly strategies, and that i do no longer think of of any persons on suited right here would have had plenty get suited of get right of entry to to to it, the two. So, i do no longer think of of any persons can understand the whole tale till finally he's unquestionably convicted, or in line with probability then, there is in all probability a stable variety of stuff that the standard public heavily isn't steered. That aside, besides the shown fact that, i does no longer be bowled over the two way. The case keeps to be fairly plenty up interior the air, and at the same time because it grew to become into presented that they had a suspect, i grew to become into fairly bowled over that they thought that they had adequate strategies against somebody to arrest them. i grew to become into under the a number of result that a lot of what that they had have been rendered unusable via actuality of an infection of the crime scene. i bypass off of Karr's Wikipedia website, suited right here, which will or could no longer be uncertain, yet I assemble that the strategies they have against him is fairly circumstantial, which, on an identical time as no longer precisely suspect, isn't precisely damning, the two. So, i in my view have no concept. what's for particular, besides the shown fact that, is that he's an entire weirdo, and that i in my view do no longer think of of he could prefer to be on the line, inspite of no count selection if or no longer he killed JonBenet. It feels like he's complete a lot of harm someplace else.
2016-11-05 10:48:27 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't think he killed her. The fact that she can't find the pictures is not relevant in my book. I dated a guy for 8 years and I can recall every Christmas that we were not together. Christmas is the time of year that families go out of their way to be together especially if they have children. If he could not be home with her and those kids, she would definitely remember that. Things like that really matter to women. Let's just wait on the DNA evidence and forget the pictures.
2006-08-23 00:20:33 · answer #3 · answered by pretty_brown_eyes 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think he is a total nutcase, because he is telling the autorities that he raped her but there was no evidence that indicated that she was raped, and he also stated that he drugged her before that but the autopsy found no signs of drugs. As well his ex wife said that they weren't even in the same city the night she was murdered. So no I do not believe him, he's just being crazy.
2006-08-23 00:19:00 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
as i just answered the question i dont think he did it. i think he is just a psycho sick petafile who wants to take the blame for that. it is just too weird. it dont fit. imean it is like someone paid him to say that cause he was not in Colorado, and then look at his demeaner when he is on camera. like its weird. i am not feeling this one. day after christmas. how did he get in the house. i believe the one that did it still out there someone that was already there, and they paid this man to say that. too weird just anxious to close it of course its been years but i dont think its him. i need ro hear how this man got in there house upstairs and no one hears this. around christmas kid are still up playing. why wasnt her brother up or was he??????
2006-08-23 00:23:02 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Guys, he did it to get out of Thailand! Anywhere is better than a Thai prison and he was wanted over there for something. In short, no he isn't guilty of killing Ramsey.
But Jesus Christ! He looks like freakin' Oswald! Mr. Kennedy, I know who killed you!
2006-08-23 00:49:04 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I'm not a investigator but for someone who "Loved her" he killed her brutally. First he raped her then he strangled her with a rope and hid her body. You also have to remember this guy was arrested a while back for another case involving a child who was ALREADY killed. I believe he is a psycho who is obsessed with stories of children who where raped and killed.
2006-08-23 00:19:18 · answer #7 · answered by redman9250 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I so want it to be true, but I don't think it is. Regardless of whether it's true or not, this man needs off the streets. Perhaps the child porn charge in CA will get him.
2006-08-23 00:22:19 · answer #8 · answered by Miss Vicki 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I don't think he did it. His version of events doesn't seem to add up. I think he just obsessed about her to the point where he might even believe he did it. Either way, he needs to just get put out of our misery.
2006-08-23 00:32:14 · answer #9 · answered by Kuji 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
My feeling says no he did not do it, but what do I know?
That's what we have judges and juries for.
I bet not many people will try to escape jury duty for this one!
2006-08-23 00:19:39 · answer #10 · answered by Hi y´all ! 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋