If the leaders actually had to take part in the wars they send troops to fight in, they'd be a lot less ready to make war. I think it'd be nice if it happened. Someone was saying on here a while ago how you can't understand what the soldiers have to go through until you are in their shoes.
A closer approximation of what the Iraqi people are going through would be to make to live in Iraq for a week or so, with no more privileges than an ordinary Iraqi citizen. In one sense the Bush family ought to be on their way out there.Impossible to make it work, but that's where I think you'd have to be to understand what's happening in Iraq.
2006-08-22 23:20:54
·
answer #1
·
answered by Buzzard 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
you have a suited to dislike each and each guy or woman you like. He did alot of robust issues as President such via fact the conflict against terrorism on their very own turf which i do no longer think of no different president could have carried out or could have the balls to do different than in line with probability for Reagan. remember his invasion of Iraq grow to be UN recommended and grow to be an allied attempt. As for the customer workers bill i'm interior an identical boat as you're. character smart i'm returned with you yet i think of of the stable no longer the undesirable on a scale i could fee him like 7/10 as President as a guy or woman with morals a 2/10 or perhaps then i could be giving him to lots credit.
2016-11-05 10:45:04
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
OK then. You tell him to go. I'm sure he will listen to you. Anyway, "comprend what he has done".??
Last I heard it wasn't Bush or any US or coalition troops killing Shiites with sniper fire on a pilgrimage, blowing up crowded markets with car bombs, rocket and mortar attacks on civilians, attacking mosques, etc it is the radical islamic extremists
2006-08-22 23:21:38
·
answer #3
·
answered by Munster 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
you must be a liberal...who would think of something so stupid to send the president into harms way to prove a point he already understands...do you really think he wants Americans to die in Iraq...he sees the big picture of what is going on...you do not...try not to be so narrow minded...only focusing on one aspect of the war on terror...does another 9/11 have to happen before people like you will wake up and smell the hate our our enemy that won't stop until we are dead...because we are the great Satan and the infidels...
2006-08-22 23:09:20
·
answer #4
·
answered by turntable 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yep! He opened Pandora's box , so why not let him get a taste of the force of it. I would feel very sorry for the rest of the troops in his would be unit though.
2006-08-23 00:36:51
·
answer #5
·
answered by Christine H 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
I would be tempted to vote yes, however think about it - if he should be shot and killed in the line of duty this would not be a good thing......his supporters would make a hero out of him and we'd never, ever, hear the end of it.
Just bear with it, only a couple more years and (hopefully) he'll be out of our lives for good!
2006-08-22 23:09:24
·
answer #6
·
answered by Lisa 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
His whole staff should go, we can mange without any of them for the ten minutess it will take them to realize the errors of their ways.
2006-08-22 23:09:06
·
answer #7
·
answered by Marcus R. 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
if more leaders had to go and do the fighting maybee they wouldnt be so quick to start wars in answer to your question yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes oh yes
2006-08-22 23:08:53
·
answer #8
·
answered by prevails 3
·
2⤊
1⤋
He would probably do something else stupid and shoot one of his teammates, or blow himself up with a grenade.
2006-08-23 02:09:12
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Idiot...
Did you eat a lot of paint chips as a kid?
2006-08-22 23:08:19
·
answer #10
·
answered by Jon H 5
·
1⤊
2⤋