that you are supporting ICC and in other word hair.
Is it not look like that you are showing hidden hostility with Pakistan and
want to demoralize or it is not looking that you are getting your better position
in front of ICC for future for favorable sympathy of ICC. Don’t you agree that we must stand together (Asian countries) against this injustice that you are putting allegations without proof you cant say that Pakistan did it this is only allegation without proof what is this plz answer specially Indian ( is it not shah say ziada shah kay wafadaar)
2006-08-22 21:40:19 · 7 answers · asked by Akmal Zaidi 4 in Sports ➔ Cricket
YOU ARE RIGHT.
THE SUB-CONTINENT CRICKET BOARDS SHOULD OPPOSE THESE THINGS UNITEDLY.
ICC GETS MAJOR INCOME REVENUE FROM US.
BUT,
NEVER VALUED OUR FEELINGS.
OUR CRICKET BOARDS SHOULD THINK ABOUT IT.
2006-08-22 23:06:28 · answer #1 · answered by A.R.RAJA 6 · 4⤊ 0⤋
when India was in trouble with the ICC not to long back , you received the full backing of the Pakistani Board.The Indian support could only be denied if the whole affair is deemed as Inzi and Pakistan's fault. Umpire Hair has tangled with Sri Lankan and Indian players in the past. HE HAS NEVER TANGLED WITH ANY EUROPEAN PLAYER. Is that not significant for you. He tangled with Murli during the Test match which was watched my millions, and after that affair wrote a book, he could have easily taken the same action in a side match or matches that he umpired with Murli featuring in it .
In Pakistan, Hair also had a first, this too against Pakistan, Butt was warned against running ON to the wicket, the team was docked runs and a general; warning was issued to the whole team , Butt then was not Bowling !!!! and if you were watching the action then one would have noticed that Butt did not do much wrong at least at the ball he was censured. This reprimand cost Butt his wicket the very next ball. Kaneria was taken out of the attack for running on to the wicket , not during his bowling action but whilst fielding the ball!!
Some umpire Mr. Hair , he is very partial to Asians . so much for his playing by the book.
.
2006-08-23 21:11:26 · answer #2 · answered by jarad_us 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It is an asian issue ...
Murali is not a muslim and he was targeted by hair too//.supporting Pakistan is in the intrest of india too,its in the mutual intrest of asian countries to fight racism,if this racist attitude of ICC is not changed NOW then keep getting darrel hair's and good luck with all your ICC disputes,you would't get need a genius to guess what way would ICC goes if Asians back down NOW!
Its NOW or NEVER!
If india does't support Pakistan,goodluck answering to your kids why did't you walk with asian community on this issue..
2006-08-23 00:26:53 · answer #3 · answered by Ali 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
properly, you're saying you're a muslim and you for sure do. no longer only the cricketers however the Jihadi terrorists too. it fairly is Muslims who associate each little thing with faith. while Pakistan lost the 1st 20-20 cricket international cup, the Pakistani captain grow to be apologising to the international's muslims for allowing them to down as though Pakistan represents each and all of the international's muslims. there have been muslims interior the Indian team too which gained. i'm Hindu and that i did no longer even have envy for Pakistan becoming up as a new child. I enjoyed the no longer common opposition between India and Pakistan. I continually needed India to win yet my familiar bowler grow to be Wasim Akram and that i even used to ape his bowling action as a new child. yet many muslims even see activities as a non secular conflict. To appreciate a Pakistani cricketer for his cricketing skills is okay yet to rejoice Pakistan beating India via fact's an Islamic usa once you're an Indian citizen who happens to be a Muslim is close to to being a traitor.
2016-11-05 10:42:26 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If India and Pakistan played any matches Indian muslims are supporting Pakistan, Pakistan and England playing a match British muslims supporting Pakistan. Muslims are united for your religion not for your country, you do not have loyality to your own nation. Pakistan plyers made mistakes and violating International crticket laws, ICC will take right decision for that. We Indians are believe in ICC rule and regulations and we dont want to support violations against any international law. You are trying to articulate political agitastion over the ICC through sympathizing and synthasizing support from Asian nations. In the border of India so many terrorist intruded inside India's territory to kill my people, my brothers, my sisters, senior citizens, co workers. In the border so many military man have been killed pakistan trained militants, in this situation I could not support Pakistan activities in the ground, because they are violating all international laws. So I am condemed the pakistan players activity ball tampering in the UK ground and I am supporting all actions taken by ICC against the team.
2006-08-22 21:52:12 · answer #5 · answered by Devaraj A 4 · 3⤊ 1⤋
inzi was perfectly roght...he dint harm the spiirit of the game...i bet had there been any other captain...he would have walked off straight away...but inzi dint wanna insult bllody daryl hair...daryl hair is YET 2 PROVIDE EVIDNCE...and the law says that u cannto judge just by looking at the state of the ball that is has been tempered...one has 2 provide evidnce and nam a player or 2....and my point is that when cook got out...the ball was reversing and then it was in poisession of the umpires..were the umpires blind at that time...??and just in 2 overs time...they found a big scratch and accused the team of tempering...this is shameful umpiring...agree or not...but both billy and hair have always been against apakistan...i have dozens and dozens of proofs of thier biasness against team pakistan...and had that been planned...inzi would have been oprating with 2 fast bowlers rather than kaneria at one end...or did he expext kaneria 2 rverse swing the ball with the so called tempered ball?? the rules imply that if a team efuses 2 play the umpire must go 2 the captain n iform him b4 h puts the match 2 n end...but what hair did...was taht he awarded the win and went away...and if u say that hair is the man of laws...does nay1 remmeber thr run out decision at faisalabad against inzi...according to the law...he shouldnt have refred it 2 the 3rd umpire even...and what will u say upon strauss and peitersen talkin on moboile sets when the match was not called off yt!!!! were they talking 2 som booikies..?? coz i am sure had that been pakistani player talkin on mobile in the dresseing room...he would have been accusd of match fixing...bloody malcom speed is an australian...therefore hell always support hair!!! hate HAIR...hate ICC
2006-08-22 21:58:39 · answer #6 · answered by Zuhair-from-pakistan 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
u r right,conscious but indians will not ever cooperate with pakistan because how they will wish to loose oppurtunity to insult pakistan,india was our enemy,is our enemy and will be,so we must not expect any well wish or sympathy from india
2006-08-23 00:02:20 · answer #7 · answered by ghulamalimurtaza 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋