men can also answer without gender bias
2006-08-22 20:17:42 · 19 answers · asked by stent 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Yes, because if anyone should be against the Islamic fascists it would be the radical feminists.
Islamic Fascists own their women, tell them what to wear, keep them uneducated, tell them when to talk, tell them were they can go, tell them what they can think, mutilate them, kill them at will and they keep them second class citizens!
- think about it.
2006-08-22 20:20:18 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 4⤋
Absolutely not. The key word here is radical. Radical anything should not be chosen to lead anything. There are plenty of things wrong with radical feminism. There is nothing wrong with feminism, but radical feminism is pretty far stretched. I have a problem with any perspective that wants to blame any sex for the roots of social problems. True, there needs to be a balance between genders, but radical feminism only swings the weight to the other gender. It is the mirror of what was wrong with the first 20 centuries of western history.
2006-08-23 03:23:34 · answer #2 · answered by The Disappearing Act 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I don't want a radical anything running this country. Why does it always have to be far right or left. Just for once I would like to see some nice working guy be president so he actually knows what the majority of Americans really go through day to day. These people cant relate, having been catered to all their life!
2006-08-23 03:27:54 · answer #3 · answered by Valkyrie 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The reason Hilary is so far behind McCain is because she's a radical femenist! The only way a democrat would win the elections would be if they could pursuade republicans to vote for them too. Hilary is too extreme in her views. Even if she was to have favorable ideas about current issues there would be fear that she would also begin touching on things that traditional repubicans absolutely dissagree with.
2006-08-23 03:26:08 · answer #4 · answered by Cindie 2 · 3⤊ 1⤋
No. Just as I would neither like to see a radical chauvinist male elected.
2006-08-23 03:20:52 · answer #5 · answered by ElOsoBravo 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
If you're talking about Hillary, she's far from being a radical feminist.
She wears skirts for crying outloud!
2006-08-23 03:23:17 · answer #6 · answered by DEATH 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Chances are, a radical feminist would support abortion and homosexual marriage, and I oppose both.
2006-08-23 23:11:13 · answer #7 · answered by man_id_unknown 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
As long as the nail clippings of that woman has more intelligence than the current turd besmearing the White House, have her come in and take over.
2006-08-23 03:38:16 · answer #8 · answered by The answer man 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
I'm guessing you are reffering to Clinton. I would be dumbfounded if she won the presidency and it would make me vomit. I'm not against a woman being president, just not her for sure.
2006-08-23 03:21:43 · answer #9 · answered by Dan 1 · 5⤊ 0⤋
Hillary Clinton will never be elected.
2006-08-23 03:19:07 · answer #10 · answered by Trollhair 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I don't care what the heck is head of the country...it could be an alien just makelife better here!
2006-08-23 03:19:48 · answer #11 · answered by Tomekk 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋