English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

tom, just didn't know how to conduct himself in the media. his involvement with katie i think hurt his career. i don't mean the age different. if they click so be it. but going on oprah and jumping off the sofa and telling matt laur on the today show, that he knew nothing about the drug ritlan. i thought the idiot was an actor not a doctor. i don't know if the world knows it or not but,tom struggled through school taking one step forward and two step backward. he was really adumb ***. how he ever became an actor beats the hell out of me. oh! i almost forgot everytime you saw them together in public you would always see them kissing, sucking face, blowing in each others ear. i think what they both needed was a room. i think paramount done the right thing. but don't worry tommy boy if you clean up your silly and disgusting behavior in the public domain someone may come along and pick you up and sign you with another movie studio production company.

2006-08-22 19:54:45 · 19 answers · asked by mistyblue16 1 in Entertainment & Music Celebrities

19 answers

He will land on his feet. This may cost the studio a lot in the long run if Cruise straightens up his act...

2006-08-26 14:12:12 · answer #1 · answered by exbuilder 7 · 9 0

I say Bravo to Paramount!!
Tom is cute, but he is always Tom when he acts. A good actor can become someone he isn't. LIke I said......Tom is always Tom.

His worst poooooopah was hiss thing with Matt Lauar. Geesh......he is self rightous and obnoxious........what the HELLO is Katie thinking. I do worry that she is brainwashed. I think Tom is a sociopath. Full of himself. And I worry about that little baby who will no doubt grow up to either be a clone of her dad or live in constant rebellion.
I say our troops need to invade Tom's compound asap

Time for Tom to get some humililty. Let Katie go. Free Suri.

Tom is actually becoming scary!!! The couch thing was cute the first jump...then it just went downhill from there. Katie must of been smitten and then brain washed.

OH OH I remember long ago that Tom was sterile and couldn't concieve and once when his X wife...whats her name got PG he was mad cuz he wasn't able to concieve. So.......why hasn't the media thought about that ?????????

2006-08-22 20:05:11 · answer #2 · answered by clcalifornia 7 · 0 0

I think Paramount is wrong for kicking Tom Cruise out.
I find nothing wrong with him, he's just being himself. Of all things people should learn from him and learn to be their own individual self instead of acting like someone else just because somebody is around. In this case why should Tom act different to the media. What's wrong with jumping on a couch?? Jack Black did it too. How come you're not throwing a hissy fit over that?

Why do people get these dumb ideas that just because they act...they should be considered saints and role models.

And what's wrong with kissing in public???
If you really find that disturbing, then you have a mental problem.

Mark my words, Tom is DEFINITELY not out of the Hollywood spotlight. He is too good of an actor to be tossed out just for being himself.
You people should quit critisizing other people just cause they aren't like you.

2006-08-22 21:20:50 · answer #3 · answered by kruzzz80 2 · 0 0

I think Tom has some good points when it comes to psychology. However, Scientology doesn't exactly have a shine, clean reputation either. However if Katie Holmes will have me I know I would make a better husband and I promise not to jump on the furniture or shake Oprah Winfrey like one of those fat jiggling gym machines from the fifties.

2006-08-22 19:59:07 · answer #4 · answered by willberb 4 · 0 0

No, Paramount is unquestionably incorrect both of their decision and how they went about it. i don't believe of everybody can blame Tom Cruise for being enthusiastic about being in love (the leaping on the settee) and no one should be indignant through his speaking about Scientology. the very undeniable actuality that some absolutely everyone is indignant basically exhibits what bigots they're for no longer having the flexibility to be tolerant of somebody else's faith. yet as for Paramount and Sumner Redstone, the theory that MI3 did not cause them to adequate funds is a load of trash, it made in extra of $three hundred million, and over the years Tom Cruise has made billions for them. Sumner did not even notify Tom Cruise that he wasn't renewing his contract previously he stated it with the media. the decision is not basically incorrect yet they way it became executed became in really unfavourable flavor. i think that anti-Scientology bigotry had plenty to do with this. that is a shame that absolutely everyone remains persecuted for his or her non secular beliefs in a rustic that supposedly believes in non secular freedom and in protecting human beings from religiously-depending discrimination.

2016-11-27 00:14:14 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Paramount fired Tom Cruise? I didn't know.

Oh well.

What do I think about it? Ummm.... Good thing? No wait! Bad thing? Ummm...

Do I really have to have an opinion about this? Can't I just get away with being moderately sorry for him that he lost his job and leave it at that?

I'm trying to care. To muster up some sort of emotional reaction, one way or another, but... ugh.. I just can't quite manage it.

Sorry.

2006-08-22 20:23:45 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Tom is an idiot, I am still mad at paramount cutting Star Trek Enterprise just as it got good..

2006-08-22 20:04:53 · answer #7 · answered by D G 2 · 0 0

I think he crossed that magical line when he tried cramming the Scientology thing down everyone's throat. There are plenty of other celebrities(Travolta, L. Presley, Kirstie Alley, L. Renna,etc.) who are scientologists, but keep their beliefs private.
I think Nicole is way better off without him.
Cute man, but way too strange.

2006-08-22 20:10:37 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I think the sooner that people like him are out of the public eye the better.
We need more real and sane people to be role models, not weird religious freaks.

2006-08-22 19:59:11 · answer #9 · answered by Pebbles 2 · 0 0

well i think its just no business of paramount 2 interfere in 2 tom's personal life & throw him out of the co. or watever that is

and U R WRONG

2006-08-22 20:24:54 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers