Like all liberal reporting of the news, the bias and slant is toward favoring America's enemies. NYT uses the word RESISTANCE MOVEMENT to explain Hezbollah. Fox New uses the word TERRORIST to explain Hezbollah. As you can see, Liberals are always against America and report slant news. And Fox News report objectively.
2006-08-22 19:45:57 · 14 answers · asked by curious 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Fair and balanced! Have you missed it? Do you think they are not, Fox News?
Yes, liberal lies -- actually commie propaganda -- is designed to destroy America, stealing its Treasury and giving it to the commies and to a favored clique, friends of those in power.
Oops: it's George W. Bush who abolished (nearly) taxes on the very rich, making the top 1/10 of 1% of Americans rich beyond belief.
And emptying the Treasury of its surplus. And giving America's wealth (selling off its industry cheap, peddling its Treasury bonds) to . . . wait for it . . . the Communist Chinese!
"While America Slept"
Americans, more than any people in the world, vote against their own economic and political interests, and over peripheral, nearly irrelevant issues: Presidential oral sex, abortion, school prayer, flag burning, "offiical English" (and, hey, Spanish is the official language of Puerto Rico, USA, by the Treaty of Paris and the Organic Act) . . .
2006-08-22 19:56:18 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
If you are a country boy who blindly believe what an authority tells you to believe, than it doesn't matter what others write. You already have one sided picture. Because some of the people think different then majority, it doesn't mean they are favoring enemies. They are objective. They have made researches, they find different views on terrorism and that is a true freedom. I don't live in USA or in an Arabic country, so I can be objective about terrorism. Nobody is raping me with one sided news. I can see what Americans or Muslims or Jews can't see.
2006-08-22 20:06:08 · answer #2 · answered by nelli 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
You are a moron. Yes The NYT is liberal which isn't good. Fox news is even worse...they are not even news. I don't really pay much attention to either because they create IDIOTS. If we actually travelled and learned about the world for ourselves perhaps we'd have a chance, but we are happy sitting back in our chair and getting our news from whatever source makes us feel right. BULLS**T. Go find out for yourselves...if you can't you have no right to judge.
2006-08-22 19:55:54 · answer #3 · answered by skippybuttknuckle 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Yes, that makes sence I agree most major newspapers especially the new york times are highly Liberal. We get th LA times on sunday only but not so much for the news. Also, yes Fox is known to be less liberal, at least their news, idk about some of their programing.
2006-08-22 19:49:19 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
because of the fact the two Jews and Arabs continuously attack the ny cases for its partiality, they're probably getting it top on their information pages. This dispute has been quite aired by skill of them on the OpEd pages. it somewhat is nicely time-commemorated that the ny cases Editorial and OpEd pages are weighted in direction of the liberal and that their information pages are thoroughly autonomous of their editorial opinion. yet their OpEd pages additionally contain conservative regulars and espresso members. in assessment to The Wall highway magazine, the place the information is quite freed from taint (different than, like the cases, insofar because of the fact the U. S. consensus is weighted in a definite way) while the Editorial and OpEd pages are blindly Conservative (arguably added top than that). Even Hezbollah's enemies and fighters might desire to confess that they have been the only source of secure practices and social centers in the south of Lebanon. i'm continuously amused whilst each physique is so blinded themselves that they can't tolerate statements of certainty that are inconsistent with their preconceptions or their agendas. And, in the rustic, fail to equate one terrorist with yet another. Terrorists tend to enhance into gangsters because of the fact the motivation and ability are there. The IRA and Hezbollah, to call in basic terms 2, extort and rob, on the same time as ministering to their very own respective constituencies. yet I see American Congresspersons reciting hagiographic accolades over Gerry Adams and his clique on the same time as (rightly) denouncing Hezbollah terrorists. by skill of definition, terrorists kill harmless civilians and infants, often even their very own as a thoughts-set of, nicely, terror and outrage.
2016-10-02 10:39:38 · answer #5 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't see how TERRORIST is to Hezbollah any more then bunny is to Neptune. Reporters are human and as such they have opinions and bi-est views no network is exempt from this human flaw read both and take what you can from both to understand what really happened
2006-08-22 19:51:23 · answer #6 · answered by Gwen Kerr-Healy 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Fox's News is the best!
2006-08-26 18:04:35 · answer #7 · answered by sher7us 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Wait till a Liberal is elected president. Then they can start WWIII and the NYT will back them all the way
To Arifin - Resistance groups fight the invading military only, Terrorists fight the invading military, shoot rockets at civilians only, use suicide bombers, and hide behind their own civilians.
Hezbollah = cowards and terrorist's
2006-08-22 19:48:33 · answer #8 · answered by mark g 6 · 3⤊ 2⤋
'Fox News report objectively'
No they don't, if they would they would say that the Israeli raids in Lebanon aren't harming Hezbollah, but the people
2006-08-22 20:12:16 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Fox is owned by a bunch of bigots in white hoods
http://streaming.americanprogress.org/ThinkProgress/2005/stormfront_fox_news.320.240.mov.html
2006-08-23 01:11:19 · answer #10 · answered by helena2581 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋