It seems clear that single leaders can run rampant and destroy millions, if not billions of lives. Why do we allow single men to run our destinies? It seems to be culturally-based insanity. Instead, shouldn't we have a group of Executives or Leadership Council, of men and women? It could be an odd number, say 7, 9 or 11, to prevent indecision, with rules to make quick decisions (like, flipping a coin or using a dog to vote in case one member is not available)!
2006-08-22 17:44:32 · 5 answers · asked by bwsnyder2000 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
Yeah..and this becomes inherently clear when Congress does whatever that one president wants..and the system of checks and balances has been pretty much wiped out.
I agree, we need a Leadership Council made up of different backgrounds of people.
2006-08-22 17:47:39 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
A leadership council's even more retarded to have. That's basically like having monarchies of the past where leaders elect their family and friends while excluding others.
2006-08-22 17:50:39 · answer #2 · answered by Redeemer 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What this country needs is a good third party because at present their isn't an nickle difference between the two we have. Neither party presents you or I.
Also, instead of politicians we need statesmen. Statesmen work for the people where as politicians work for the party and being reelected.
2006-08-22 19:57:19 · answer #3 · answered by wild4gypsy 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Should there be a Council, nothing will ever be decided. Instead, we witness them as if they are in a zoo.
2006-08-22 17:59:05 · answer #4 · answered by Bummerang 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
because if you know anything about government you should know about checks and balances and what is allowed in the three branches of government
2006-08-22 17:48:19 · answer #5 · answered by tony r 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋