I swear to god if one of you mention George W Bush or name any names for that matter you will be reported.
2006-08-22 17:31:46 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Government
Its not taking away your right to free speech. I asked a question with specific directions. If you cant follow directions then you'll get exactly what you deserve. Deal with it, because honestly you could just decide to not answer at all.
2006-08-22 17:39:09 · update #1
The exact same qualities that make sure that person will never survive the politics of getting elected.
Like honesty for one.
2006-08-22 17:34:30 · answer #1 · answered by MrPurrfect 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Someone who will attempt to balance a budget. Someone who will worry about domestic policy such as education, keeping jobs in the country or at least penalize the big businesses that go into 3rd world countries to make products, then sell them here for a 1000% profit, stop going into other countries to make money and state it is for "democracy" and "freedom", someone who is SMART enough not to try to sell our seaports to Arab leaders with ties to terrorist, someone who won't cut taxes only for the top 1%, someone who is smart enough to UNDERSTAND THE CONSTITUTION, someone who thinks about raising minimum wage so the poor have a reason to get a job, and someone who won't impose their will on others because he doesn't believe in them (I'm not gay, but if God doesn't like it, LET GOD DEAL WITH IT)...
2006-08-22 18:02:11 · answer #2 · answered by linus_van_pelt68 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Preferably you'de have someone honest and open (unlike Slick willy who seemed honest and open, but you can never be sure, and all his "friends" ended up in jail). You also want someone intelligent, possibly well educated. But, I would say after that, you diverge greatly from most of our presidents. You want someone who isn't trapped by a political party, who has an aversion to war, who is gentle and generous with the military, who has a strong personal philosophy and morality, but doesn't impose it (mostly) on others, and who isn't well connected in government or rich society.
2006-08-22 17:37:42 · answer #3 · answered by BigPappa 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
The exact opposite of whats in office now.
2006-08-22 21:09:08 · answer #4 · answered by trl_666 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
so just what gives you the right to take away free speach you must be one of those libercrats who only like free speach when you are talking
2006-08-22 17:36:23 · answer #5 · answered by bigrigdvr 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
is this funny and if so, why?
Hillary Paris 08
2006-08-22 17:34:52 · answer #6 · answered by Hymn 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
bill clinton....report me
2006-08-22 17:33:31 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋