Scientific method?

Question

Which of the following questions cannot be answered using the Scientific Method?

Are bees more attracted to red roses than to yellow roses?
Are red roses more beautiful than yellow roses?
Why are red roses red?
Do red roses bloom sooner than yellow roses?
Are red roses more susceptible to mildew than yellow roses?

Answer 1

The second question is the only one that's purely a matter of opinion and individual judgement. Beauty isn't a measurable quantity or quality. The other ideas can be tested and some way to measure the results can be designed.

Answer 2

Are red roses more beautiful than yellow roses?

Answer 3

Are red roses more beautiful than yellow roses?

Answer 4

Are red roses more beautiful than yellow roses?

You can not measure how beautiful somthing it, but you can measure how people rate beautiy. If the question were changed slightly to: "Do more people think red roses are more beautiful than yellow roses?", it could be answered using the scientific method.

Answer 5

Are red roses more beautiful than yellow roses?

Answer 6

are red roses more beautiful than yellow roses?


it's a subjective question and there is no standard for beauty. what's ugly for me can be beautiful for you. the other questions can provide objective data, and you can actually conduct an experiment to find out the answer to it.

Answer 7

Your starvation and ate occasion is incorrect. heavily study it returned and you will see why. The contra-constructive is barely valid if the unique conditional is often actual. the occasion you gave isn't actual. you would be hungry even after having eaten if the quantity eaten became into inadequate to fulfill the starvation. Your argument in this element isn't justified. "people by skill of nature beg the question, and count on their very own good judgment to justify their very own good judgment, which doesn’t paintings. If a million+a million= 2, what's extremely being reported is two=2, which gets me nowhere if I don’t comprehend the cost of two, or one, or one plus one. Such around good judgment is likewise stumbled on with superstition." it somewhat is obvious you're no longer a mathematician. in case you have been you will possibly certainly comprehend that a million+a million = 2 because of the fact of set concept. bypass learn previously you think of this is in accordance with around good judgment. "as an occasion, the Bible in accordance to many Christians is written by skill of God, it additionally by skill of honest danger, says so in the Bible (besides the certainty that there is not any direct scripture that announces that)." The Bible without postpone states that each and all of the books stumbled on therein the place written by skill of adult males who have been supposedly inspired by skill of God. Nowhere in the Christian dogma does it state that the Bible is extremely God's very own writing. you certainly might desire to stop making use of examples you haven't any longer studied precise. you're incorrect approximately technology being based upon technology. technology relies upon on phenomenon spoke of in the universe, no longer upon itself. technology is the learn of varieties stumbled on between phenomenon in the universe. technology isn't the phenomenon themselves. this is astonishing what number cases you're able to be incorrect in in basic terms some paragraphs.

Answer 8

I agree with Jim H.

Answer 9

The second it is an opinion, not a fact.

Answer 10

All of them can be answered by science.