the guys above are are couple of pricks.
Yes, its perfectly reasonable if the umpires are cheating to refuse to continue, this tactic brings their cheating out into the open rather than just letting it go on and on year after year.
2006-08-22 16:41:22
·
answer #1
·
answered by vaivagabundo 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
First of all everyone stop talking trash about Pakistan!!! Darrel Hair had no evidence which showed any of the Pakistani players messing wid the ball!!!! He had no evidence. Secondly, Pakistan did the rite thing. The umpire did not tell anything to the Pakistanis and gave England 5 runs and had a new ball bought out. All i'm saying is...... PAKISTAN ROCKS!!
2006-08-22 19:37:59
·
answer #2
·
answered by gunnerz4lyfe! 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
are you speaking regarding the warmth up excursion with the A team against England ? nicely i think of its a solid theory what India are doing as you do no longer elect England to have an early look at India's spinners and Englands exposure to what's possibly to be their best project throughout the try sequence. plus ithink they could desire to hold of Yadav till finally the try cos i think of he ought to accomplish a little injury to england as no longer many have seen him the subsequent useful is they are enjoying those adult males interior the warmth up Irfan Pathan, Ashok Dinda, R Vinay Kumar and Parvinder Awana and im hoping Dinda or somebody els will do realy nicely and get positioned into the main squad ,England say that's much greater sturdy and greater substantial than an ashes sequence Engalnd can chosen to no longer bowl Finn and huge in the event that they dont elect to exhibit there superb bolwers to the A team
2016-12-11 13:30:28
·
answer #3
·
answered by mijarez 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
psycho pig answered in the manner he had t...jusst as his name suggests....inzi was perfectly roght...he dint harm the spiirit of the game...i bet had there been any other captain...he would have walked off straight away...but inzi dint wanna insult bllody daryl hair...daryl hair is YET 2 PROVIDE EVIDNCE...and the law says that u cannto judge just by looking at the state of the ball that is has been tempered...one has 2 provide evidnce and nam a player or 2....and my point is that when cook got out...the ball was reversing and then it was in poisession of the umpires..were the umpires blind at that time...??and just in 2 overs time...they found a big scratch and accused the team of tempering...this is shameful umpiring...agree or not...but both billy and hair have always been against apakistan...i have dozens and dozens of proofs of thier biasness against team pakistan...and had that been planned...inzi would have been oprating with 2 fast bowlers rather than kaneria at one end...or did he expext kaneria 2 rverse swing the ball with the so called tempered ball?? the rules imply that if a team efuses 2 play the umpire must go 2 the captain n iform him b4 h puts the match 2 n end...but what hair did...was taht he awarded the win and went away...and if u say that hair is the man of laws...does nay1 remmeber thr run out decision at faisalabad against inzi...according to the law...he shouldnt have refred it 2 the 3rd umpire even...and what will u say upon strauss and peitersen talkin on moboile sets when the match was not called off yt!!!! were they talking 2 som booikies..?? coz i am sure had that been pakistani player talkin on mobile in the dresseing room...he would have been accusd of match fixing...bloody malcom speed is an australian...therefore hell always support hair!!! hate HAIR...hate ICC
2006-08-22 17:23:22
·
answer #4
·
answered by Zuhair-from-pakistan 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
No evidence has been shown that the ball was tampered. Al Haq was wrong to question an umpire's decision while the game was going on. An act of brinkmanship cost Pakistan the game.
2006-08-22 19:14:10
·
answer #5
·
answered by brogdenuk 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Once again we find a team cheating to win obviously because they are not good enough. Congratulations to Darrel Hair the umpire for standing up for fair play and if the Pakkies want to go home then I say goodbye and good riddance.
2006-08-22 16:33:12
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
First of all my dear friend you should have to use that damn thing called "Check spelling"
Now coming to the question you've asked.
Now I dont know whether you wanted to say 'writ' or 'right'
So I just want to say that yes every step taken by Pakistani team was legitimate, it was a question of our pride, and what Pakistani team and management did is highly prudent.
2006-08-22 19:17:42
·
answer #7
·
answered by Ω Nookey™ 7
·
0⤊
1⤋