English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

8 answers

It is both. Some people just cannot feel it or hear it well enough to make it sound right. It also takes a certain amount of intelligence to learn an instrument... and voice has to be something you are born with. But all the talent in the world cannot make up for the lack of training and hard work and study. That's essential.

2006-08-22 13:35:27 · answer #1 · answered by mia2kl2002 7 · 0 0

I know people that have never taken a lesson and rock. I also know of people that knew nothing about music and had it taught to them, and they, too, now rock. I don't think the answer has to be one or the other. It's different for everyone. Some people do have the natural ability, and some people need to be trained.

I remember wanting to be a musician before I was trained, but I didn't write any music until I learned how to. My freind Nate has never taken a lesson in his life and can write music that's better than mine in many ways. If he had the training, i think his music would be substantially better. The question is would I have written the music if I hadn't been trained? My guess is no.

I have to disagree with mia2k. I think that talent alone can go very far. The musical knowledge is important and valuable, but I wouldn't say it's necessary or required. Also, a voice can be learned as well. Alien Ant Farm's singer, when he started singing, was not nearly the singer he is today. A big part of that is finding your own voice. So, you could say that you're born with your voice, but it will take practice and more practice to FIND it. So, if you wouldn't be able to sing well without that practice, I would personally consider that person to be trained to be a good singer, rather than it being a natural ability. Being tonedeaf, having rhythm, etc, may have different stages of genetic ability. If someone has a 0 on the tonal recognition scale, he may never be a good musician with years of practice, but if he is a 3 on the scale, maybe he could learn tonal recognition with a lot of practice, while someone with a perfect ten wouldn't need any practice at all in that department, but could focus the practice in other areas of music. Whew, that was a mouthful. I hope that makes sense!

2006-08-22 13:35:56 · answer #2 · answered by Brianman3 3 · 0 0

I purely figured that those cats were good with gadgets the way i am going to run very quickly. i became born that way, particular I artwork flat out to stay in structure and run plenty even with the undeniable fact that this is organic to me and that i relish it. So I usually low cost the skills element purely because I figure those large device gamers probably sense about taking section in the way i think about operating. yet in view that i have in no way extremely even tried to play an device, i am going to't extremely choose it really is why I infrequently answer those "record the right ten guitarists ever" type questions. yet when I listen bands like ACDC making songs that sound a similar because those they made in 1976 I even ought to ask your self each in certain situations no matter if i could do this.

2016-12-01 00:51:15 · answer #3 · answered by schlau 3 · 0 0

I have talent but i cant play or sing a note.

2006-08-22 13:52:51 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

both I naturally sing but I had lessons 2 play the piano

2006-08-22 14:34:40 · answer #5 · answered by Daniela 2 · 0 0

It depends really. Some people are born with it and some people need vocal lessons to get as good as others. I guess it just depends on who you are.

2006-08-22 13:36:14 · answer #6 · answered by armybratincamo 3 · 0 0

I think most of them fave to practice.

2006-08-22 13:37:05 · answer #7 · answered by sonomansfo 1 · 0 0

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/;_ylt=AmbmvLMOHYQHm8hLuTsVy24jzKIX?qid=20060822163309AAeZg6U

2006-08-22 13:35:58 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers