My friend said its like soft core porn,but she saw it in a theatre in the 80's and said it was good.What do you think?Is it worth the $30 I would have to pay for it?
2006-08-22 13:26:53 · 6 answers · asked by Celebrity girl 7 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Movies
I have a copy of it, the purple unrated copy and it is a good film though there is a lot of sex in it. It does however star John Geilgud, Malcolm MacDonald, and Helen Mirren. If you like sex gore, violence and a little history it is worth the money.
VHS is worth that.
DVD it only cost me 19,99 but they didn't know it was the unrated version.
2006-08-22 13:30:14 · answer #1 · answered by LORD Z 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The unedited version of Caligula is definitely better but incoherent with the storyline. Rent it. One viewing is enough. The paperback was co-authored by Gore Vidal, out of print and hard to find. The book is much more informative. I gave copies of the paperback out as Christmas cards in the late 1970s.
2006-08-22 13:35:47 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. I'd avoid it. It's anything but history. Here's what:
' Caligula - The Abuse of Power ' - by Anthony Barrett
I was really surprised by this. You can accept lies, you can accept facts. Up to the individual.
2006-08-22 13:29:19 · answer #3 · answered by vanamont7 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
she must have saw the edited version, it is a hard core porn. but with awsome cast and story line. don't pay 30 $ for the edited version though..
2006-08-22 13:30:18 · answer #4 · answered by The Key Master 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i own a copy i dont think its worth 30 bucks go to a used dvd store and buy one and yes it has its moments of porn
2006-08-22 13:29:50 · answer #5 · answered by punkinhead0 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
God NO!!! it was long and UNSEXY. didn't find it very entertaining or erotic. i remember there being a few 'hardcore' scenes in it. So not worth $30.
2006-08-22 13:34:41 · answer #6 · answered by JuJitsu_Fan 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋