2006-08-22 13:00:24 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Television
He might well be a w***** in your estimation, but he's got more money than you'll EVER have ! ! !
2006-08-22 16:45:12 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I did not know that euphemism when I was a small child but even in the 1970's I hated him and thought he had a depraved soul. He is a badly timed and pretentious git.
2006-08-22 20:04:24 · answer #2 · answered by mairimac158 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You have my vote. 100 percent . Think Graham Norton and Jonothon Ross have reached that detached from reality stage aswell.
2006-08-22 20:12:45 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Nah....now Antony Worral Thompson...
2006-08-22 20:10:48 · answer #4 · answered by ladypeonie 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
He might be a bit of a prat but he's not done badly out of it? For that sort money a lot of people would do a lot worse things!
2006-08-22 20:10:28 · answer #5 · answered by Bymble 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm not a fan of his by any means, but calling him a walrus isn't really justified. There are plenty of people fatter than him on TV.
2006-08-22 20:12:08 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Never trust a man with a beard. They're always hiding something.
2006-08-22 20:15:38 · answer #7 · answered by sparky 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
A witch? Yes probably, his beard has special powers!
2006-08-22 20:32:40 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think he is a w*****, I have held this opinion of him since about 1970.
2006-08-22 20:40:10 · answer #9 · answered by ? 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm not bothered either way
2006-08-22 20:02:07 · answer #10 · answered by harvestmoon 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋