I MISS HIM TERRIBLY! I HOPE HILLARY RUNS AND WINS SO THAT BILL CAN MOVE BACK INTO THE WHITEHOUSE!! WE NEED HIM BACK!!
2006-08-22 12:24:08
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
4⤋
I have never said that Bill Clinton was bad.
I just think that the hatred toward Bush is disproportionate given both of their track records.
Maybe he was the best since JFK (best Democrat, that is)
2006-08-22 19:17:40
·
answer #2
·
answered by SVern 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
I agree with you.Bill Clinton was an excellent president.A great number of Americans are on the fence when it comes to presidential elections and this is where Mr.Clinton won the presidency.
2006-08-22 19:32:19
·
answer #3
·
answered by hungerforknowledge 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
I wouldn't call it a landslide since he never got the majority of votes in both elections.
2006-08-22 19:19:41
·
answer #4
·
answered by david g 3
·
3⤊
1⤋
Amen sister! I could not have said that better. Everyone prospered then. Unemployment was down. The world was happy! These smart tale Repubs....have just ruined everything. They are selfish individuals that only care about themselves or people that can contribute to their success. No one else should even exist in their world.
2006-08-22 19:40:39
·
answer #5
·
answered by pretty_brown_eyes 6
·
0⤊
2⤋
Because Republicans have very small brains and did not realize whom they were voting for. Besides Carl Rove was not on the scene yet hiding out in Texas helping George W. screw up that State.
2006-08-22 19:27:41
·
answer #6
·
answered by Jim G 4
·
0⤊
3⤋
Republicans are trying to make Clinton look bad becasue Bush is doing such a bad job in office. I mean their presidencies are like black and white. So the replicans are attempting to make him look bad so bush will look good.
2006-08-22 19:19:42
·
answer #7
·
answered by butterflykisses427 5
·
0⤊
3⤋
well... I think that there are many out there that are not republicans or democrats... that's where elections are decided.. with the "netherworlders"... that probably make up a decent percent of the population...
2006-08-22 19:18:23
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Probably cause they had no jobs and there children were starving after 8 years of regan and 4 of the smarter bush
2006-08-22 19:20:49
·
answer #9
·
answered by god 1
·
0⤊
3⤋
I agree , his policies led to a powerful debt free economy and he believed in peace first over war. he was in no hurry to start a fight.
2006-08-22 19:16:00
·
answer #10
·
answered by nocateman 5
·
1⤊
2⤋
i agree with you....his personal life was none of our business...he did more for this country then anyone since JFK.
2006-08-22 19:18:21
·
answer #11
·
answered by Paulien 5
·
0⤊
2⤋