hey cons,,,is it fiscally responsible to run up massive debt and continue spending with no end in sight?

Question

then giving tax cuts to ensure the next generation has to pay off your stupid mistakes

Answer 1

lol I side by you mate they are all a bunch of **** you know who they are, the ones giving me negative quotes on this!

Answer 2

What are you talking about? We are doing great things with that money, like building million dollar bridges to nowhere while the victims of Katrina in the sourthern region of the united states are still living in tents and trailors waiting for the help that they were promised!

It's time to wake up people and realize that just because you are a conservative doesn't mean you have to back an regime of idiots that dont have anybodys greater interst at heart but their own......and the comment about the tax cuts.....PUHHHHLEEEZEEE the average middle class family or working poor family spent that little bit of nothing money on gas last week!

Its foolish comments like the one about the tax cuts that shows us why we are in so much trouble......Idiots voted the jerks back into office to finish destroying the country!

Answer 3

it really is the concept -- through prudently reducing taxes, the business equipment will be inspired. With economic boost will come higher earnings, higher production (which matches all the way down to distributors,and so on.). With the added funds, there'll be more desirable gross sales to the authorities, no matter if the tax cost is decreased. it really is the reason, in sessions of economic boost, the deficit very just about continuously falls (sales boost). bill Clinton did not boost the tax cost; did not shrink federal spending, yet balanced the funds because of economic boost. Now, it really is the rub. Democrats/liberals might want to assert that tax cuts might want to bypass to the middle and decrease type. They reason that, in case you supply those human beings an more desirable thousand money, they'll spend it on "stuff." the folk who make the "stuff" will employ more desirable workers (to satisfy the decision for), and purchase more desirable cloth to make the stuff (and so on). Republicans imagine that the breaks might want to bypass to the wealthy and organizations. With the added funds, the agencies might want to make investments in equipment, and so on., thereby stimulating the business equipment. problem -- if factories and shops are literally not operating to potential, there heavily isn't funding in infrastructure. further, the wealthy do no longer spend funds they have, and the cuts do no longer bypass into the business equipment. the wealthy use tax cuts for funding, frequently into the inventory market. yet remember, funds invested in the inventory market does no longer bypass to the agencies. the money (except in the preliminary providing, it quite is statistically inappropriate tot he market), is going to the seller of the inventory. that is basically trading money. it really is the reason, at the same time as R. Reagan tried the trickle-down theory, reduce tax prices, and decreasd company taxes, the organizations got here upon themselves with a great deal added funds. Did they make investments in the infrastructure? No. rather, they used the accessible funds, leveraged it, and offered different organizations (the biggest era of mergers and acquisitions in heritage). the outcome became that a lot of human beings (in the obtained organizations) lost their jobs, a shrink in competition, and a stagnating economic equipment through the right of the Reagan words. desire this permits.

Answer 4

Yeah, I'm sure the banks are going to call in those debts any day now. I mean they don't depend on a good economy for their business, right? At least, you're admitting that there are tax cuts. That's a first.

Answer 5

no way , we should slowly go back to the gold standard and rein in these massive debts forever and really be on a set budget.

Answer 6

you do realize that approx 1.7 trillion of that money has be in defense of our land, hurricane relief from 8 hurricanes hitting the US in 3 years, and the WTC, right?without those things.....the deficits we have been having would be next to nil compared to every other president we have had in the last 40 years........bet you didn't know that, now did you?

Answer 7

It's no accident - they want to bankrupt the country so then they can say that the government can no longer afford to pay for social programs. They will then cut them for good It's an ingenious plot.

Answer 8

Are you looking for permission? Oh I see your just ranting and raving with no real thought in mind.

Answer 9

it is called welfare checks and food stamps, you know like the checks you get in the mail once a month!!

Answer 10

my goodness, even when our great president does something outstanding like tax cuts, it still aint good enough for these libs.... shame shame shame