How bad was Laird? The finale was so awful! Laird was always cutting everyone off, he asked ONE online question, the online game finale hunt was so short and scattered (and none of the players RAN. They were SO slow and unmotivated. They just clomped along. No running, no sweating. Just $100,000 on the line. I wish I won so I could race all of those old fatties), Laird never talked to Katie Fogel about what an unbelievable whiny baby she was. Laird was SO concerned with moving along and keeping within the hour live finale that he sucked. And why was it only an hour?? That wasn't nearly enough time. Plus, I think NBC tricked us by saying the whole time, it was a live finale when it wasn't. It was just a stupid reunion show. NBC needs to take a page from CBS when they do Amazing Race and Survivor finales/reunion shows. Who's with me? PS-I really loved the show and hope they bring it back. Just fire Laird and do a better "finale". :)
2006-08-22 11:18:29 · 2 answers · asked by Sarah 4 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Television
i couldnt agree more.
it sucked harder than my gf
and laird was absolutely horrible.
and 3 mil.?
thats a million a piece.
not really worth all the effort.
2006-08-22 11:23:16 · answer #1 · answered by dankap04 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I thought the Traesure Hunters finale was pretty good...the geniuses won, and they seemed really happy to win, so that's good for them, i guess.
didn't watch too much of the "live" stuff afterward, though...but i watched it up untill then.
2006-08-22 11:28:27 · answer #2 · answered by rocksolidjra 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋