English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Am I the only taxpayer that has a problem with our government using taxes to pay for John Karr's 1st class airplane ticket home? He had roast duck and champagne for dinner. The tickets were $3,000 each and we paid for 5 for a total of $15,000. I dont fly first class why should we have to pay for him to fly 1st Class?

2006-08-22 10:40:47 · 14 answers · asked by Parker 2 in Politics & Government Government

14 answers

Guilty or not in the Ramsey case; the guy is a pedophile & a nut case.
Shipping him home in the cargo hold...in a coffin, would have been a better choice.

2006-08-22 10:46:55 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I am sure that it was a security deal. This case had nation wide attenion for 10 years. the 1st class was more secure and more private. I didn't hear about the roast duck, I heard about the giant prawns. On first class that is all included in the ticket price, although I thought it was illegal to give a prisoner an alcoholic beverage.

2006-08-22 10:51:18 · answer #2 · answered by Thomas S 6 · 0 0

people % this to be over. they actually do. somebody, some the place knows some thing something individuals do no longer. John Mark Karr might desire to be puzzled... they might desire to no longer in basic terms drop this occasion. So, it wasn't his DNA, yet what if he became into involded. What if this undesirable guy knows some thing. The government have seen this. Its politics.... They hate to be proved incorrect, they do no longer % to look undesirable. retaining the case ought to injury their "suitable" rep. So why do it? *Sigh*

2016-10-02 10:16:23 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

I agree with you, we shouldn't have paid so much for his flight home. You are wrong though - it was Business Class not First Class. He shouldn't have received the champagne or great dinner, feed him slop and water.

2006-08-22 10:46:30 · answer #4 · answered by Tommy D 5 · 0 0

It'll be the last roast duck he eats for a long time.

2006-08-22 11:12:53 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

The authorities thought that this fancy stuff would open him up to more answers as to why he did this...I believe they did this for their own personal pleasure for a long flight to California...We taxpayers shouldn't have to foot that bill...

2006-08-22 10:44:29 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

unfortunately he's innocent until proven guilty but damn it the guy's supposed to already be a pedophile isn't he? even if he isn't I never heard of criminal suspects getting first class treatment. the guy should have ridden coach with no movie and a basic meal, and that cop who clinked glasses with him should be kicked in the balls and fired.

Vin

2006-08-22 10:48:24 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I totally agree nor have I EVER eaten roasted duck.

2006-08-22 11:44:31 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

First of all, he had prawns - not roast duck. But I agree with you: he should have been put in the cargo hold of the plane.

2006-08-22 10:43:46 · answer #9 · answered by -RKO- 7 · 0 1

Yeah, I know, it's annoying. But I take comfort in the fact that he will probably never eat like that again. He'll spend his next several years in the joint serving as Bubba's b**ch!!!!

2006-08-22 15:52:55 · answer #10 · answered by frenchy62 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers