I get: Micheal Vick or Byron Leftwich, Reggie Bush, Deuce McCalister, Willis McGahee
I give away: Eli Manning, LaMont Jordan, Peerless Price, Mike Anderson
Should i take it or not?
2006-08-22 08:50:12 · 21 answers · asked by C-Bo 3 in Sports ➔ Fantasy Sports
Eli is way better than Vick in Fantasy, Jordan is better/more durable than McGahee in fantasy, Mike Anderson may end up starting, and you Bush and McCalister cancel each other out because you wont know who to start ot who will have the big game. Peerless Price is a chump.
I'd say don't make the trade.
2006-08-22 09:09:40 · answer #1 · answered by kris_rynshall 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
This trade has a bunch of questionable players. Mike Vick is OVERRATED!!! Eli Manning is also OVERRATED but not as OVERRATED as Mike Vick. LaMont Jordon is a better fantasy RB than McGahee. Mike Anderson is a backup to Jamal Lewis. Peerles Price is going to be a horrible fantasy player this year. Reggie Bush & Deuce McAlister will make second guess yourself all season long. However, I was able to trade Reggie Bush & Deuce McAlister for Clinton Portis. Anyways, I don't think you'll be able to do that. If you are able to do that, then trade for the players. If you can't, then I say don't accept the deal. I'm pretty sure you can find a better RB on the FA Market than Mike Anderson. Frank Gore and Mike Bell are two examples. As for Peerless Price, just drop him for any decent WR.
2006-08-22 22:00:11 · answer #2 · answered by Mike Jones 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Actually, no one seems to win in this trade. Vick will get you some points, but with barely any wide recivers, it won't be that much. Same with Leftwich, and he has nowhere near the mobility of Vick. Bush and McCalister will split playing time, and having them both is a huge risk since you are screwed if the Saints have a bad week, and they will have bad weeks. I think McGahee will have a pretty good season. With Moulds gone, he will be the go-to guy, but they don't have much of an o-line there.
Manning, and Jordan will get you points, especially Jordan who will carry the load since Brooks has no accuracy. Peerless Price was a one-hit wonder, and won't come close to those numbers he had a few years ago with the Bills. Mike Anderson is no longer the number one option (that going to the dueling Bells).
It doesn't look good either way, but I think you get more talent if you keep the players you have.
2006-08-22 16:02:50 · answer #3 · answered by jnowak5 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Take it. I'd take leftwich over vick though. Mike anderson is going to be used as a fullback, price is nothing more than a 3rd receiver, jordan is ok but bush and McC will earn more. The only loss will be with manning but in the end you'll come out a bit better.
2006-08-22 17:33:12 · answer #4 · answered by M Double 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Heck yeah, go for it. Bush alone will make up for the trade (I usually won't say that about rookies). Don't get Vick though, he runs way too much and gets hurt wayyyyy to easily, Leftwich is the guy to go for there (Leftwich did about the same stats as Vick last year but Leftwich missed the last 5 games!) McGahee is supposed to have a breakout year (finally), so he's a good pickup. Good luck!
2006-08-22 17:32:00 · answer #5 · answered by goldiemcg 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Make the trade (push for Leftwich over Vick).....Peerless Price and MIke Anderson are dead weight. The guy you're trading with is a fool.
2006-08-22 22:49:05 · answer #6 · answered by jh361 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Only if you get Leftwich. Mike Vick still hasn't proven he can throw accurately. You are getting the better RB set, and wide receiver talent can probably still be had off the waiver wire (I picked up Keyshawn and Donte Stallworth in a public league). You need Leftwich for this to be fair though.
2006-08-22 18:23:52 · answer #7 · answered by punkkarrit182 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I'd do it. You lose something at QB, but not as much as some might think. If you have a choice, I'd probably take Vick, but it doesn't matter much.
You're only giving away one RB (Jordan) and getting 2 (Mcgahee and the NO Duo). Bush should be a monster by mid season, and you'll still have Deuce to start until then.
Pull the trigger.
2006-08-22 16:12:38 · answer #8 · answered by mikep426 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
I would not take this trade
Lamont Jordan is one of the best runningbacks in the game and Eli manning is one of the best QBs. You are just getting a lot of good RB and a average at best QB for two great players.
Always keep the great players
2006-08-22 19:56:02 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Dunno
Manning is the best qb out of those 3, but price and anderson will hardly see the ball
Also geting two of the Saints RBs makes it like using two rosters spots for one RBs stats.
2006-08-22 19:17:04 · answer #10 · answered by The Sheepdog 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋