Democracy will eat itself?

Question

In a democracy, if 51% of the electorate vote to abandon democracy for another ideology then democracy stops in that society.

Please let me know if there is an obvious error in my hypothesis.

Does this mean that a democratic state can be overthrown simply by high birth rates of a group that chooses to suppoort a different political system or even a religeon?

The group would have to have enough motivation, a good infrastructure and a 100+ year game plan but I see no defense provided by a democracy with a 5 year electoral period.

Maybe I am the first British citizen to ever consider the question but I doubt it. I am no genius.

...or am I not being politically correct?

Answer 1

Democracy is the worst form of government except all the other forms that have been tried from time to time. ~ Winston Churchill said that!!
He looked so damn cool, i trust him!

Answer 2

The corporate greed of capitalism is what's "eating" democracy. A few financially powerful individuals are buying up the politicians whose job it is to protect the country and our democracy. Soon the people of this nation will have absolutely NO say in how it's run. It's almost there now. We need to ensure all our anti-monopoly laws are put back in place to encourage better competition, more diversity, and reasonable prices in the current & coming global market place. But as long as the few richest are pulling the strings you'll never see it. Keep that in mind when voting in the coming elections. Peace~

Answer 3

I consider you that the priority could be traced returned to centralization of ability. as quickly as we supply others ability over us, that's an inherently risky element. while each and all of the vast weapons are controlled by ability of a small team, you may only wish that the small team would not get corrupted. there's a sort that addresses this interior the Babylon 5 television sequence, however even this have been given corrupted for a volume of time. The ruling Minbari gray Council grow to be composed of three representatives each and each from the three Minbari castes: worker, Warrior, and spiritual. a concern more suitable while the stability grow to be thrown off quickly. Having only 2 events in contact in government is a foul thought. 3 (or greater, ideally a wierd selection) is mandatory to having ideal exams and a rebalancing of disagreements. as much as a pair factor, in all probability, the greater advantageous the variety of events in contact, the greater clever often is the alternatives made. Having greater events in contact gives you stable opportunities for sound debunking of undesirable techniques, and greater minds which could supply techniques no longer concept-approximately by ability of the others. Having been a member of a 12-guy or woman board of administrators, I observed this in action generally. each and each sitting board member grow to be his or her very own guy or woman, and besides the shown fact that there have been a lot of matters that had clean shrink unanimous judgements, there have been additionally a lot of matters that for the duration of contact very lots of communicate and controversy, between those with some stable know-how of the priority who cared approximately voicing their factors of view on it. yet while a political association takes priority over very own integrity, as we see in our Republican and Democratic politicians right this moment, then there can effectively be only 2 perspectives on a controversy, while there could and in line with probability could doubtlessly be 1000's.

Answer 4

Well, in the United States it would have to be 3/4 of the states (for a constitutional amendment).

A simple majority wouldn't be sufficient.

Answer 5

Yes, you are in error. The Constitution protects us.
However, the liberals are now in a process of changing the Constitution to fit their own agenda.
If the liberals are successful, our democracy will be destroyed and you will be correct.

Answer 6

Cheerio, old chap. Your logic is infallible. Democracy means mob rule. Fortunately, here in the good old USA, our founding fathers, after kicking Cornwallis out, founded our nation as a Republic, a nation governed by LAWS, not a majority of the people.

Answer 7

Logically you're correct and I suspect you are talking about the Islamist element in British society. But even so I do not think this would happen in so bold a way as you are suggesting. It would occur very slowly and stealthily.

Answer 8

I think that democracy can surely turn into socialism with this scenario. The people that want to consume tax dollars keep voting for more and more benefits from those that produce revenue.

Answer 9

theres no democracy in this world... only wars justified by devils as democracies .....

since when has human lives become sooooo cheap ?

Answer 10

Yes that could be done , but who?