This team can win the league.
QBs: B+. I really like Delhomme. He's a notch below the Peyton Mannings and Tom Bradys of the world, but he's a solid second tier guy. Culpepper has a lot of upside, and he was worth the risk with such a solid pick like Delhomme in front of him.
RBs: A+. I had the first pick in my draft too, and I also chose Alexander. McGahee is a great #2. Our RBs are a lot alike, I have Alexander, J. Jones as my 2 (I'd rather have McGahee but he wasn't available for me at #24), and I have Gore, who has a great upside as the undisputied #1 RB in San Francisco.
WRs: A. I think Torry Holt will drop off ever so slightly with Martz leaving, but he's still a solid #1. I have Donald Driver on my team too, he'll put up big numbers with Favre back and the questionable RB situation in Green Bay. Galloway might suffer a little bit with Simms at QB, but as a #3 he was a steal (I have a very similar player in Rod Smith). Bryant and Muhammad have a lot of upside with the QB situation for both being more stable than last year.
TE: B+. Witten is a notch below the top 2 of Gates and Shockey, but he's very solid. I have Todd Heap, and I think he and Witten are similar.
K: A. Tynes plays for a good offense, but with the more conservative Herm Edwards, it should lead to more field goals. Josh Brown is a very capable kicker also
DEF: B+. Although I don't think Seattle or Jacksonville are elite defenses, you should have a great matchup each week as both are very solid.
Overall, I think you should be favored to win your league. I might look to trade/drop one of your WRs for another RB in the tier 3 range since RBs are more likely to get hurt, but your team is really strong. You can always drop the extra D/K for another TE when Witten is on his bye.
2006-08-22 12:44:30
·
answer #1
·
answered by teddybgame12 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Looks like a pretty good team. Muhammad has potential to be your #2 receiver over Galloway. You may want to find more depth at RB in case McGahee or Alexander get hurt. Gore may be OK as a #3,but you can never have too many RBs. You should be a top 3 team if everything goes right.
2006-08-22 07:41:19
·
answer #2
·
answered by clone1973 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
If that's a 12 team league... Then that is remarkable If that's a 10 team league...that's good, yet desires somewhat artwork --- WRs & RBs are good yet no longer large TEs & Ks are large QB is o.k., Hasselback is maximum persons's backup & no longer starter Defenses at the instant are not something particular... Neither gets sufficient sacks or turnovers you have a gamble, yet attempt including some intensity in loose organization
2016-12-17 15:23:39
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think it is a really solid team
However I would try to get more runningbacks because runningbacks take a lot of beatings and are easily injured
Also you have no need for two defenses. I would drop one of them for another runningback. Maybe a Kevan Barlow if he's available because he's recently been traded to NY Jets
2006-08-22 12:58:34
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
this is better than your other team. To get Holt and Mcgahee at 20/21 is a steal.
2006-08-22 07:39:39
·
answer #5
·
answered by mikep426 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
yeah that team could probally make it to the playoffs but would loose in round 1
2006-08-22 14:57:26
·
answer #6
·
answered by matthew_bove 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
F-------------------------------------------
2006-08-22 07:38:13
·
answer #7
·
answered by poipman1 3
·
0⤊
0⤋