English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

10 team league, 1st pick overall
QB J. Delhomme
WR T. Holt
WR J. Galloway
WR D. Driver
RB S. Alexander
RB W. McGahee
TE J. Witten
K L. Tynes
DEF Seattle
BN D. Culpepper(Mia-QB)
BN F. Gore(SF-RB)
BN A. Bryant(SF-WR)
BN M. Muhammad(Chi-WR)
BN J. Brown(Sea-K)
BN Jacksonville(Jac-DEF)
Is this team good? Does it have a good chance of winning?
Any suggestions to make it better? Grade it please! Thank you in advance!

2006-08-22 07:28:28 · 7 answers · asked by The Fantasy King 5 in Sports Fantasy Sports

7 answers

This team can win the league.

QBs: B+. I really like Delhomme. He's a notch below the Peyton Mannings and Tom Bradys of the world, but he's a solid second tier guy. Culpepper has a lot of upside, and he was worth the risk with such a solid pick like Delhomme in front of him.

RBs: A+. I had the first pick in my draft too, and I also chose Alexander. McGahee is a great #2. Our RBs are a lot alike, I have Alexander, J. Jones as my 2 (I'd rather have McGahee but he wasn't available for me at #24), and I have Gore, who has a great upside as the undisputied #1 RB in San Francisco.

WRs: A. I think Torry Holt will drop off ever so slightly with Martz leaving, but he's still a solid #1. I have Donald Driver on my team too, he'll put up big numbers with Favre back and the questionable RB situation in Green Bay. Galloway might suffer a little bit with Simms at QB, but as a #3 he was a steal (I have a very similar player in Rod Smith). Bryant and Muhammad have a lot of upside with the QB situation for both being more stable than last year.

TE: B+. Witten is a notch below the top 2 of Gates and Shockey, but he's very solid. I have Todd Heap, and I think he and Witten are similar.

K: A. Tynes plays for a good offense, but with the more conservative Herm Edwards, it should lead to more field goals. Josh Brown is a very capable kicker also

DEF: B+. Although I don't think Seattle or Jacksonville are elite defenses, you should have a great matchup each week as both are very solid.

Overall, I think you should be favored to win your league. I might look to trade/drop one of your WRs for another RB in the tier 3 range since RBs are more likely to get hurt, but your team is really strong. You can always drop the extra D/K for another TE when Witten is on his bye.

2006-08-22 12:44:30 · answer #1 · answered by teddybgame12 2 · 0 0

Looks like a pretty good team. Muhammad has potential to be your #2 receiver over Galloway. You may want to find more depth at RB in case McGahee or Alexander get hurt. Gore may be OK as a #3,but you can never have too many RBs. You should be a top 3 team if everything goes right.

2006-08-22 07:41:19 · answer #2 · answered by clone1973 5 · 0 0

If that's a 12 team league... Then that is remarkable If that's a 10 team league...that's good, yet desires somewhat artwork --- WRs & RBs are good yet no longer large TEs & Ks are large QB is o.k., Hasselback is maximum persons's backup & no longer starter Defenses at the instant are not something particular... Neither gets sufficient sacks or turnovers you have a gamble, yet attempt including some intensity in loose organization

2016-12-17 15:23:39 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

I think it is a really solid team
However I would try to get more runningbacks because runningbacks take a lot of beatings and are easily injured
Also you have no need for two defenses. I would drop one of them for another runningback. Maybe a Kevan Barlow if he's available because he's recently been traded to NY Jets

2006-08-22 12:58:34 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

this is better than your other team. To get Holt and Mcgahee at 20/21 is a steal.

2006-08-22 07:39:39 · answer #5 · answered by mikep426 6 · 0 0

yeah that team could probally make it to the playoffs but would loose in round 1

2006-08-22 14:57:26 · answer #6 · answered by matthew_bove 3 · 0 0

F-------------------------------------------

2006-08-22 07:38:13 · answer #7 · answered by poipman1 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers