It doesn't make much sense.
Clearly getting pulled from line and thoroughly searched at the airport for maybe 5 minutes is less invasive than having all your phone calls monitored.
Why are Republicans all for wiretapping but have a real problem with being searched at airports?
2006-08-22 07:15:34 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
"The question here is a double negative so it doesn't make any sense. The Neocons want both of those types of harassment's to occur."
Actually, many are saying we should racially profile Arabs and Mexicans and anyone else without white skin at the airports. They are not for being searched themselves at the airports, they are for having others searched.
I'm saying, since they are so concerned about security, so concerned that they would risk having their own phones wiretapped illegally, why are they not worried about some white guy converted Muslim going through the airport and committing some horrid terrorist act?
2006-08-22 07:31:15 · update #1
"Why do Dem's not want wire tapping and want stricter racial profiling at airports?"
Actually, dems do not want racial profiling at the airport. We think that racial profiling will lead to other violations of freedom such as plastering golden crescents on Muslims so people can identify them...you know, like the kind of things the Christofascist Hitler did.
2006-08-22 07:35:25 · update #2
I love how Repukes are unable to answer any kind of question.
2006-08-22 07:43:51 · update #3
because they're fat
2006-08-22 07:24:15 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
incorrect, my good guy. you want to get well out of your anger and understand something. the in ordinary words (examine: in ordinary words) energetic terrorists contained in the international immediately are (examine: ARE) human beings from the middle East. The FBI fairly a lot rounded up all the blond-hair, blue-eyed Tim McVeigh wanna-be's, after 19 April 1995. The a ways precise skinhead communities are through-and-tremendous contained. maximum black, white, brown and yellow human beings are pleased with the racial profiling and are drained of being hassled on the airport purely because our authorities is doing the 'gentle-feely, do not favor to offend every person' element. pay interest, the following is a tip for you - take a seem at what the Israelis do at their airports. even as became the most suitable time they'd an incident in flight or on the floor? Oh, wait...did I offend you through suggesting that Israelis may have a good concept on a thanks to wrestle terrorism? Soooo sorry...that became probably too ethno-centric on your gentle eyes. like it or not, the terrorists at the on the spot are not some African-American grannie (like the single I observed being worked over through the TSA goon squad on the San Diego airport) or some pimply-confronted white youngster...it really is gonna be some 20-something guy from the Mideast. it really is a truth. it really is a truth. it isn't racial profiling. And if it saves one existence (of every person in any united states of america of any religious or political conception) then I, for one, am for it. thanks for permitting me to certain my ideas!
2016-12-01 00:17:13 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because a 90 year old African American Lady is not going to blow a plane up. Why search her,, As for the wiretaps the judges ruling and her conflict of intrest will be over turned, The rest of the Circuit has ruled contrary to her opinions as stated in the case and the Court of Appeals will strike it down. She was appointed by J. Carter to that seat. Politics lurks in her opinion.
2006-08-22 07:32:38 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Why do Dem's not want wire tapping and want stricter racial profiling at airports?
2006-08-22 07:25:39 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
racial profiling is just plain wrong. its as simple as that. many people in my race (i am white) would rather ignore the facts that racism still exists in this country. one day the terrorists will find out that security guards dont thoroughly check the nice old white lady, or the cute little white kid. i hope nothing happens, but racial profiling would increase that risk.
2006-08-22 07:26:53 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
The purpose of profiling is not to save time or money, but to concentrate our efforts on individuals that match the profile of our enemy. Democrats did worse during WWII by putting Japanese-Americans in concentration camps.
2006-08-22 07:44:11 · answer #6 · answered by MorgantonNC 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The question here is a double negative so it doesn't make any sense. The Neocons want both of those types of harassment's to occur.
2006-08-22 07:23:32 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
your question is what doesn't make sense, take a look the demorats voting records, andrew youngs statments and decide whose really doing the racial thing.
2006-08-22 07:42:22 · answer #8 · answered by sealss3006 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What's next. People who agree with Darwin won't be allowed in airports?
2006-08-22 07:35:18 · answer #9 · answered by Mysterio 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Wire tapping doesn't affect them, but waiting in line for two hours does. What don't you understand???
2006-08-22 07:25:23 · answer #10 · answered by mymadsky 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
We should be racially profiling...PC will be the death of us...
2006-08-22 07:33:08 · answer #11 · answered by smitty031 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋