If I praise Hezbollah/Hamas/Al Queda and mock and attack Israel - and the West wins the war on terror - I will be forgiven because the West has good Christian people and they HAVE to forgive me.
result = OK for me
If I I praise Hezbollah/Hamas/Al Queda and mock and attack Israel - and the West loses the war on terror - the terrorists will like me and I won't be hurt
result = OK for me
If I back Israel and the West in the war on terror - and the West wins the war - then I will be a hero
result = GREAT for me
If I back Israel and the West in the war on terror - and the West loses the war - the terrorists will kill me
result = BAD for me
The process in the liberal mind goes, "If I back Israel and the West, the result could be GREAT, but might be BAD for me. If I back the terrorists, the result will be guaranteed OK for me. Since I am a typical liberal and a coward who avoids risk, I will therefore back the terrorists and attack Israel."
Could this be it?
2006-08-22 05:06:55 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I think it is more basic than that. I think that many liberals are so interested in declaring war on "those evil republicans" that they fail to realize that there are real and more immediate threats to their way of life.
It is frightening how many don't realize that radical Islamic fundamentalists formally declared "Jihad" (a holy war) on America more than a decade ago. The response of the Democratic president at the time was to ignore them while doing his intern in the oval office.
Several years later a group of folks funded by the same network of radical Islamic fundamentalists committed a direct attack on American soil (not the first might I add) by using commercial aircraft as flying bombs. I find it appalling how many folks don't realize that:
1) We are at war (I'm not talking about Iraq, I am talking about the broader war on terrorism).
2) We did not declare it nor did we start it.
3) We are viewed as "The Great Satan" by our enemies and they really couldn't give a damn about your political views. Their goal is nothing less than making the western world as we know it cease to exist.
2006-08-22 05:36:43 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
If for no different reason we ought to continuously raid and per chance invade Iran to damage it really is nuclear guns ability. If no longer us then the Israelis will, yet we'd want to do a more desirable helpful job of it. i in my opinion don't like the conception of an Islamic theocracy having nuclear guns... And technically speaking we've been at conflict with Iran ever because that they invaded our sovereign territory i.e., our embassy in Tehran in 1979 and took fifty 5 individuals hostage for over a three hundred and sixty 5 days. They all started it, we ought to continuously end it.
2016-11-26 23:04:28 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, that's pretty much a completely irrational argument.
Not to mention that 3 of your premises are flawed.
First, nobody is going to praise you or forgive you for supporting terrorists. In fact, just associating with terrorists, without ever supporting them and without ever committing a single criminal action, can earn you a life sentence in prison under current US laws.
Second, the terrorists are not going to like you no matter what you do. Accept that and move on.
Third, it's impossible to win the war on terror. Just like it's impossible to win the war on drugs or the war on poverty. These are conditions that are inherent to human nature at our level of social and technological development. So, there will never be any point when there are no terrorists anywhere in the world.
The liberal argument is very simple. Israel is a nation that is a US ally. It's enemies are designated terrorist organizations. We support our allies. We hate terrorists. What part of that incredibly simple equation can't people understand?
2006-08-22 05:13:14 · answer #3 · answered by coragryph 7 · 3⤊ 3⤋
Hezbollah and Hamas are movements of resistance to invasion and occupation . They aren't "Terrorist". But "Israel" and those who back it are the true terrorists !
Zionist "Israeli" murders are the criminals committing genocide daily , and for JUSTICE , nobody should support them !
They pretend crocodile tears , that they are defending but actually they are attacking even innocent people ...
2006-08-22 05:25:09 · answer #4 · answered by mustafa63gar 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
THE ABOVE LINK FROM "JOHN" IS 100% REPUBLICAN
OPINION.Nothing else.
now hold on there partner.I know smarts not be all that abundant out yander where yall from,but it just aint so!
You do not understand the "liberal mind" WE live in modern times.
Bush's iraq is just such a violent mess we need some new faces
in the Congress,which right now is Democrats.
Roll on partner,roll on!(man on horse rides into sunset).
2006-08-22 05:17:50 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
I think your dead on.
Good link below highlighting how Dems are trying to gain "respect" on national security
As for the Jim W below me.....
I don't refute facts that democrats voted AGAINST increase in military pay and benefits and such. Thats not opinion that is fact. You for one, can not tell the difference. Good luck on the path to common sense.
Link #2 takes care of your useless Iraq comments
2006-08-22 05:15:58 · answer #6 · answered by John 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
What's the color of the sky in the fantasy world you live in?
2006-08-22 05:14:21 · answer #7 · answered by boukenger 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I doubt it but you were right about the liberal coward part...
2006-08-22 05:14:20 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
YES YES That is it PRECISELY!
Congrats ..this should be the post of the day!
2006-08-22 05:24:05 · answer #9 · answered by smitty031 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
err, rubbish question, deserves NO REPLY!!!
2006-08-22 05:14:08 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋