2006-08-22 04:58:20 · 11 answers · asked by LINDA S 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Because it's so much easier from the comfort of the White House. I've always wondered how he would feel if his two daughters were over there in the battle zone.
2006-08-22 05:08:04 · answer #1 · answered by Starscape 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
For the same reason Clinton bombed an aspirin factory in the nineties.
Why are you sitting there at your computer degrading someone you can never be instead of fighting this war?
It takes a lot to be president, and Bush has had to go through a lot. When you can say that you've been through all the decision making and handled it as well as he has, then you can talk.
Until then. Shut up.
2006-08-22 13:18:08 · answer #2 · answered by whit 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
People like you amaze me! It must be nice to live in your near sighted world. The troops have his back because they (majority) believe in him and the cause. You will never see the truth until you are directly affected. That is sad that you cannot see past your rosy glasses.
You think COPS are out to harass people until you are a victim.
2006-08-22 12:15:31 · answer #3 · answered by jake p 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
That's silly. It is not realistic for a leader to fight the actual war, that's what troops are for.
2006-08-22 12:17:17 · answer #4 · answered by serash1 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I am with you, no troops should have ever been involved.
Jimmy Carter should bombed the living sh*t out of the animals in the 1970s.
BTW you question does not make allot of sense grammatically.
2006-08-22 12:18:10 · answer #5 · answered by SVern 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
and you think if Bin Laden would come out of hiding, and fight him, and Bush won, that would stop all this insanity? NOOOOO.....it is the only way.....you can not beat a force that thinks dying is good, and they will get 72 virgins when they die..... you must kill them....I am just amazed it is not easier...hell, they should come out of hiding, and aim a gun, so they will be shot.....
2006-08-22 12:09:53 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
What? Okay I am not even going to dignify that statement with a response.
2006-08-26 09:37:12 · answer #7 · answered by fire_side_2003 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Silly. Is this what passes for 'thought' in the neo-Dem circles?
2006-08-22 12:21:56 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
you must be high to ask such a moronic question.
2006-08-22 12:11:27 · answer #9 · answered by W E J 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Two words.
Chicken sh*t.
2006-08-22 12:06:28 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋