2006-08-22 04:47:54 · 14 answers · asked by ? 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Big Papa - yeah, sure, once the nukes are being used everyone is going to exclusively use a low radiation type? And, this of course is the type our enemies will retaliate with?
2006-08-22 05:01:30 · update #1
its pretty horrific
2006-08-22 04:55:15 · answer #1 · answered by W E J 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Yes. First there is the blinding light, and the great heat, for those not incinerated instantly, what this does is superheat your skin, so that it literally starts to melt, and slough off your body. Then the shock wave comes, and it blasts your melty skin off your body, leaving you a twisted bloody mess, dying horribly. For those who survive that, then comes the wave of flames, burning you to death.
For those outside the physical horrors, there is the radiation poisoning.
Yes, it is pretty ugly.
And if Iran or North Korea dares use on against us or against anybody, then I support the annihilation of that country. It is the only way to maintain civilization.
2006-08-22 12:13:02 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yeah! They are perfect for making the middle east a perfect place, that I would not want to live anyway. There may be a little extra but we refer to that as collateral damage.
It is the perfect peace weapon to end the 600 year war with the religion of the peace
2006-08-22 11:59:00 · answer #3 · answered by battle-ax 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Bottom-line, these Americans who advocate "nuking" are the scum of the earth and hell yeah should be punished in someway or another, such mentality should not be allowed to pass on to the next generation.
2006-08-22 11:55:57 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't advocate nuking. I have not experienced the effects of N. bombs, either.
But, I have read the effects of it. Who forgets Hiroshima and Nagasaki?
2006-08-22 11:56:47 · answer #5 · answered by Electric 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I only advocate the nuking of whales.
I see it as a win win
It's a good way to empty the worlds nuclear arsenal, launching them out at sea.
It's also a good way to end the suffering of the oceans gentle giants
2006-08-22 11:56:13 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yes, But not first hand. What they saw on TV about Hiroshima and Nagasaki is NOTHING in comparison to todays CITY BUSTERS.
Read the book WARDAY by Whitle Streiber if you can find it.
A great book
2006-08-22 11:56:22 · answer #7 · answered by smitty031 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Why do you think I want them to use "dirty bombs" at Mecca and Medina? If we can keep a death zone around the "holiest" sites in Islam for 10,000 years, they might get a clue about their stupid little moon "god".
2006-08-22 12:02:42 · answer #8 · answered by Crusader1189 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, lots of people die. And if I'm not mistaken, that is the point. It is also a good way of instilling the fear of God in people, just ask Japan.
2006-08-22 11:56:56 · answer #9 · answered by Aegis of Freedom 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
A new sophisticated 2 phase fission-fussion bomb mostly just destroys stuff and leaves just a little radiation.
2006-08-22 11:54:32 · answer #10 · answered by BigPappa 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
pretty much you go boom from the flames if you survive that then the radion will get you!
2006-08-22 11:58:12 · answer #11 · answered by hunter 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋