who's better? i'm italian so... i prefer the first!
as we said in italy he is "un gran figo!!!"
2006-08-22 04:36:49 · 29 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Football ➔ Other - Football
Cannavaro..... ma vuoi mettere il mediterraneo con quell'insipido biondino??
You can't even compare the two of them!!!
2006-08-22 04:44:12 · answer #1 · answered by Blue Blue Blue 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I like Cannavaro more, but they are so different. Why are people always comparing them to each other? They don't play the same position on the field and their skills are different. I prefer Beckham as a midfielder but as a defender I prefer Cannavaro. They are both great players but I guess that Beckham's time is almost up, Cannavaro is hotter today.
2006-08-22 11:10:21 · answer #2 · answered by Emina 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Cannavaro. Beckham isn't even good enough to start for an underachieving England squad--in fact, he was just cut. His free kicks are top of the world and his passing is accurate but beyond that he has little to offer. His speed, his ability to run at people and his defense seemed lacking. Cannavaro on the other hand had a brilliant cup for the winning team. If it weren't for head butting Zidane, he would have won best player. His energy, decision making and positioning were key in the Azzuri's defense.
2006-08-22 04:52:40 · answer #3 · answered by pw 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Cannavaro is a solid defender who gave up very few fouls in the last world cup. He is the captain of the best team in the world (the Azzurri). He rarely ever makes mistakes and he and the other members of the Italian Back 4 and Buffon worked very well together. Beckham is extremely overrated, just because a movie was named after him (and he wasn't even in it), and his free kicks are superb. But look at other players like Francesco Totti and Andrea Pirlo. They both are superb free kick and corner kick takers. Totti didn't show it in Germany, but with AS Roma he is dynamite. I may be getting off-topic, but defintely Cannavaro by a mile!
2006-08-22 05:25:47 · answer #4 · answered by Rick 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Fabio Cannavaro because his performance in the World Cup was much better than Beckham's and he better looking in my opinion
2006-08-22 04:49:19 · answer #5 · answered by thatshowiroll 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Oh, Fabio Cannavaro all the way!!!! I LOVED watching him play in the World Cup.
I'd like to share this with you and anyone else who doesn't believe he's hotter than Beckham.
www.mostbeautifulman.com/
athletes/fabiocannavaro/
bio.shtml
(You'll have to cut and paste the link.)
For some reason it doesn't allow the complete link.
By the way what does "figo" mean?
2006-08-22 04:45:10 · answer #6 · answered by it's me! 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
David Beckham.
2006-08-22 04:47:52 · answer #7 · answered by ? 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
At Beckham's prime, i'm sure he was a fantastic player, as cannavaro is right now. i really can't choose between the two because i think they are both excellent players. but currently, i will say that cannavaro has been better.
2006-08-22 04:46:42 · answer #8 · answered by sweetpanther08 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Cannavaro!
2006-08-22 04:57:03 · answer #9 · answered by Agent Orange 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Based solely on the performance in the recent World Cup, I'd say Cannavaro. However, overall, I'd go with Beckam.
2006-08-22 04:44:16 · answer #10 · answered by Link 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Cannovaro has proven himself on the world stage by leading the Italians to the World Cup. Beckham is past his prime although his set pieces and crosses still provide a threat or two. I believe Cannovaro still have a few good years left in him and Real Madrid has got themselves a good defender.
2006-08-22 04:47:12 · answer #11 · answered by Des T 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋