Did you see that Big Mushroom Cloud? The one Iran was going to respond to us with?

Question

http://news.yahoo.com/fc/world/iran

Yeah, me neither.

Think they might actually entertain serious talks with us?

lol. 3D, no i didn't. Read past the top part of questions and you wil get the whole picture. lol

Answer 1

They don't want serious talks. They want to drag this out as long as possible. They are in control and are relishing it. Truth be told, if they wanted a nuclear weapon it would probably be easier to buy one from the "missing" Soviet arsenal than to make one.

Besides, enriched uranium works great when scattered by conventional arms. Sure the mushroom cloud of a thermonuclear weapon is spectacular, but using one would draw scorn, not admiration from the community of nations. However a dirty missle, detonated in the middle of, or over, a city would still render the city uninhabitable until it could be deconned and ruin the local economy. AND it has the added benefit of every saying "thank goodness they showed restraint and used a dirty bomb and not a full nuclear weapon."

The best part is they don't have to dispose of their nuclear waste. Thats a great deal since the waste problem is the only negative to nuclear power.

Answer 2

mom Nature brings rain clouds to the international and in the middle East, mom nature does no longer deliver an excellent form of those. Dont inquire from me why and how, basically the scientists can clarify the circulate of those rain clouds i imagine it has something to do with oceans. Egypt, Turkey, Greece are blessed with some rainfall. As for that accusation or rationalization why there is not any rainfall in Iran ( the U. S. took away the clouds) that couldn't the first time |I easily have study that. i think that has been reported through yet another human being previously ahmajinibad. it would want to were Saddam Husein who reported that too. The administration of climate isn't plausible yet so relax guaranteed no united states did it to Iran. If bringing rain became plausible, that tehnology will deliver a lot advantages to many places.

Answer 3

There isn't really a good answer here. Iran may irresopsibly build some nukes (just like pakistan). Then it's divided people fight between atual democracy/thoecracy and have a little civil war and instead of thousands dieing we have millions! OR someone has to go protect the facilities.

Or maybe Iran just want to creat the ottoman empire again, perhaps cleanse the land of Sunni's, Christians, and Jews. We just don't know.

On the other hand, we can intervene and prevent it. But preemption is not very palatable, and is based many times in speculation.

Answer 4

George Bush has the whole world so pissed at the US that Iran can and will push things this far. That 1 unilateral decision to take over Iraq not only caused what just happened in Lebanon (which was actually a test of Israel by Iran) but actually inspired the next generation of Islam to hate the US. Now what, we can't bomb Iran...well not yet.

Answer 5

I'm doubtful about their eagerness to give up nukes without a security guarantee.

And I think our invasion of an unarmed Iraq has made them feel that having nukes is the only way to prevent the same thing from happening to them.

So, ironically, I think they want nukes now more than ever, and so getting them to give them up just got a lot more expensive.

Answer 6

The United States is the leading nation currently committing brutalities and injustices, yet Washington is home to a government which claims to be the ultimate moral authority on the globe. While invading and occupying nations which posed no threat to them, slaughtering innocent civilians, and torturing suspected enemies, the United States continues to mouth empty platitudes about spreading freedom and democracy, pompously lecture other nations on human rights, and hypocritically determine which nations are too “evil” to be trusted with nuclear technology.

Answer 7

Iran is apparently agreeing to some kind of talks, but they will not stop their nuclear productinon as a PRE condition to the talks. This was the US demand, and one that no self respecting country would accede to. Think about it. Iraq will talk about it's nuclear program, about limiting it in some way. This is their bargaining chip. They are supposed to give this up, BEFORE they come to the negotiating table?

We're idiots not to try talking now, before the Iran's weapons program gets any further.

Answer 8

I think they will do anything to play for time - any delay in serious action to deter them works to their advantage.

The West does not want war. Iran wants the Bomb. So we do this little Kabuki dance.

It will be much, much worse later, when we finally decide to get serious.

Sad, but true. I hope I'm wrong. I fear I'm right.

Answer 9

The only cloud I see over Iran is a cloud of ignorance. That cloud was created by Islamo-fascism.

Tough that someone doesn't approve of the truth.

There is really nothing to negotiate, either they stop or they don't. They don't give a damn what the UN resolutions say, nothing will be done for at least ten years....

If they want nuclear weapons, we can send them a couple....

Answer 10

UNSC Resolution 1696 (2006) demands that Iran suspend uranium enrichment by August 31.