He was up North for heaven's sake, checking out security there. The man can't be in two places at once. He hasn't attended a lot of events for the same reason - he was somewhere else. I didn't see Bush there either - or Tony Blair. So what makes the Aids Conference #1 in importance?
2006-08-22 04:12:38 · 3 answers · asked by theophilus 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
Geez, Ragman - he's the Prime Minister of Canada. Have you been living in a cave?
2006-08-22 11:41:31 · update #1
Because it was held here in Canada. I believe that the people who arranged it felt that they were being snubbed by the PM. However; as you stated he was up north and it is impossible to be at both. Many are just trying to create more problems and/or attract more attention to this than is actually needed. I agree that it was wonderful that Canada was able to host this conference but we were represented by Health Ministy Tony Clement and we should be grateful for this alone.
2006-08-22 04:20:09 · answer #1 · answered by crazylegs 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No offense, but who is Stephen Harper? I haven't taken the time to look him up yet, but have never heard his name...
2006-08-22 11:20:54 · answer #2 · answered by Ragman9432 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Gays are a bunch of little bitches they will cry about anything
2006-08-22 11:23:26 · answer #3 · answered by battle-ax 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋