The troops are fighting for something, you are just to blind to see. And the troops were in New Orleans helping those who refused to listen when told they needed to get out. I know this because I was one of the troops...............
2006-08-22 04:05:58
·
answer #1
·
answered by Chief 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
Yeah sure then the US can get attacked and then blame Bush for pulling the troops out. Let them stay and finish the job! Otherwise they are going to be leaving for Iraq all over again.
2006-08-22 04:01:07
·
answer #2
·
answered by Luekas 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
YES. And then send Bush and his administration over - unarmed. Bush LIED bigtime, which seems to be his forte. I watched Colin Powell when he gave the speech to the UN advocating the war in Iraq. He was so uncomfortable, and didn't want to do what he was doing - HE knew there were no WMD, but at the time he just followed Bush's orders. I think that Bush should be tried for war crimes.
There was no reason for this war, and he has killed off innocent people - more than were killed in 9/ll, and now we've lost almost as many of our armed forces as were killed in 9/ll. And all for what?
2006-08-22 03:59:59
·
answer #3
·
answered by theophilus 5
·
1⤊
2⤋
If they were fighting for nothing, I would say yes. But they are fighting for something, you just don't understand what it is. Quit listening to the liberals and open your eyes. Yes, there have been some major screw ups in Iraq, but there is a reason we are there and a reason why we can't just up and leave.
2006-08-22 04:00:27
·
answer #4
·
answered by Ragman9432 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
yes. it was such a waste when new Orleans was drenched and no on can get any one of the troops to go and assist because they were in that Iraqi hell on earth sass pool
2006-08-22 03:59:21
·
answer #5
·
answered by interested 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
since when is it for nothing. we lose many citizens when terrorists strike. it is for freedom until world can police countries and any group
2006-08-22 04:00:04
·
answer #6
·
answered by dan_dan_building 1
·
2⤊
0⤋