2006-08-22 03:50:20 · 16 answers · asked by interested 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Categories:
lesbian - maybe
gay - yes
heterosexual - maybe
homosexual - no
allsexual - definately yes
yoursexual - maybe
2006-08-22 03:59:17 · answer #1 · answered by kami_morris 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋
yes i will vote for a lesbian and gay because its probaly what this country need. Gays and lesbian are the most compassionate people in this world they will keep peace and help the ones who really need help. True enough gay marriages will be legal but i have no problem with that because you cant tell a person how to live their life and what ever they like im up for it.
2006-08-22 11:00:30 · answer #2 · answered by nina j 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
depends. If they were the ones taking it in the *** or sucking cocks, then no. If they are enough of a ***** to not have the machismo to be the man, then they cannot lead.
as far as the dykes go, I would not see the problem with that. After all, they get carpet munched, and generally are aggressive wanna-be men anyway. Lipstick lesbians aren't real ones anyway, as the only reason they dyke out is because some man raped them. The last thing we need is some wimp hiding out, jumping at her own shadow.
So only if he never takes it in the ***, or if she is the butch. Otherwise, no.
2006-08-22 11:01:57 · answer #3 · answered by lundstroms2004 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I believe that Hillary is really a Lesbian, and know I won't vote for her, but then if anyone running against her were Gay I would vote for them....
2006-08-22 10:59:05 · answer #4 · answered by battle-ax 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I wouldn't care wither way....anything to find a good leader....however, I wouldn't recommend any gay/les person running for pres.....unfortunately in todays world i think they would spend more time dodging assination attempts then doing ones job....that is not right but I think it's the truth....some people just have closed minds and are will to do anything to stop people from changing the small little box they live in.
2006-08-22 11:22:33 · answer #5 · answered by yetti 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
if a candidate has intelligent and truely fair assement of governance- I'm fine with it-
I'm not gay- but I don't care or really want to know how everyone else in the world gets thier "rocks" 1st there isn't much at all i can do about it- not that i want to either- and second -would someone want the world to know about thier own personal preferences? Clinton had to tell the whole planet he got a BJ- made him feel like he was the only one that ever happened to-
(can you imagine his personal embarrassment- and how well he handled it? can you put yourself in that space and just imagine?)
can we PLEASE keep our sex lives out of the public eye?- or lets level the playing field- install cameras in everyones (I MEAN EVERYONE's ) private areas- so congress can sit and watch 24/7 then they will really get thier jollies! let's have it a thousand cspan channels!! woot- (NOT!!)
2006-08-22 11:03:22 · answer #6 · answered by omnimog 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Anyone who was open about it, and ran for President? Yes. It says a lot about that kind of honesty. To think that we've NEVER had a gay president ever is absurd.
2006-08-23 00:27:42 · answer #7 · answered by The Garden of Fragile Egos 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would not vote for a gay or lesbian
2006-08-22 10:59:43 · answer #8 · answered by » mickdotcom « 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't really see where personal sexual issues come into play for the most part when selecting a competent candidate for presidency, so long as they don't "pull a Clinton" and put sex in the oval office.
2006-08-22 14:54:23 · answer #9 · answered by green-aly-gator 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'd wouldn't vote for them or against them because they were gay. Couldn't care less.
2006-08-22 10:57:24 · answer #10 · answered by MEL T 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'd vote for a damn chair if it could do a decent job in the White House...
2006-08-22 10:56:27 · answer #11 · answered by mutterhals 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋