English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

60 answers

Oh Lordy, you are going to get some nasty replies for that one. Buy a bike if you don't like the public transport system darling.

2006-08-22 03:48:45 · answer #1 · answered by Nikita 4 · 1 0

The spate of new building in the wake of such a terrible calamity would surely point the way to a brave new architecture, one where the presence of cameras would banish the ordinary citizens' fear of the loss of their secuirty, a second time.
Of course we're all annoying; we've got a hard time enough with the friends we've got. One day, some of us 'll be wealthy and then we can laugh and be relaxed without worry, without much care, ... though then it wouldn't be the commuter in me that should be being bombed.
Wars get fought by the disposable people at the front line.. aside from the commuters, tragic, the problem isn't with the rail network per se, it is with the fact it hasn't grown, and management, with their remarkable private sector expertise
..I've rambled off again,

2006-08-22 04:01:20 · answer #2 · answered by Brick 2 · 0 0

No, if all of us left our hummers (or perhaps our coopers) at living house and took the bus (or extra constructive yet walked or biked) we may be utilising plenty a lot less gas. it really is sparkling that all and dissimilar the gas is going into the tanks of the automobiles that provide the products that we get into our automobiles and force all the way down to the walmart to purchase each weekend. Did you flow to a Memorial day parade, did any helicopters or jets fly over the spectacle? What do you imagine is going into those tanks (and who will pay for it, through how!). see you later as you nevertheless see human beings using ecalades and hummers on the highways the gas expenses will proceed to flow up because the oil executives are nevertheless getting the message that to the "actual human beings" (those with money), the gas hikes nevertheless extremely advise not something more effective than water cooler fodder. even as this way of company yuppies actual has to diminish something out like an afternoon on the goldfcourse because of severe gas expenses then you truthfully will see it element off for a lengthy time period (it is going to in no way flow down). besides, buses are a good element and would help us all keep money on gas, as can automobile pooling and getting off our fat butts and strolling places each so frequently.

2016-11-30 23:59:47 · answer #3 · answered by ? 3 · 0 0

It's true over crowded trains are annoying, but how else can people get to work in the city. Bombing isn't the way forward of course it isn't, perhaps we could set up a decent public transport system that might aleviate you anger. Bombs are not the answer!

2006-08-22 03:51:55 · answer #4 · answered by likes_marmite 2 · 0 0

Massive bombing of Iran and Syria would do the most good.

Would it improve the over-crowded situation if you deported Muslims back to the Arab shiekdoms? There has to be a better answer than bombing London. Get to the root of the problem.... you will probably identify it as illegal aliens and guest workers.

2006-08-22 03:54:02 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

What...you'd want London bombed merely because of the trains and commuters. Of course many would secretly want to see that happen, but I suspect they would have reasons more solid (if that is indeed the word I'm looking for), for it to happen. Commuters indeed! Looks like you've got a rash of envy!

2006-08-22 03:57:30 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

It's been tried, sometimes successfully, sometimes less so. If you happen to have your own squadron of bombers, chances are you could take out thousands of us and ease the traffic chaos, yeah. Of course, everyone who didn't die would come and kick you to death with spiky shoes, so - your call. :o)

People who want to destroy London - and there are some, evidently - need to realise that it's bigger, older and uglier than they are, and it punches back. Individuals may die. Indeed, individuals HAVE died, from the days of the Blitz to the IRA attacks, to this latest lot of backpack-wielding suicidal ponces. I would never dream of making light of their deaths. But to kill handfuls of Londoners only makes the idea, the spirit of London stronger. So I guess the ultimate answer to this question is: Come and have a go if you think you're hard enough!

2006-08-22 04:30:02 · answer #7 · answered by mdfalco71 6 · 0 0

Bombing and killing thousands of people isn't a favor to anyone. No matter how annoying they may be they're people, with families and friends that love them. Al Quida thought they were doing favors too when they killed 3000 American citizens on 9/11 but the families of all those people would surely disagree.

2006-08-22 04:13:01 · answer #8 · answered by lovelee1 6 · 0 0

What kind of sick question is this? Do you realise how many people are suffering at this very instant because they are missing the ones they have lost?

I've got an idea: why dont you put yourself and all of you family in a train and try to blow IT up? That would do us all a favour...coz not only are you annoying....you're a crackhead idiot too

2006-08-22 03:50:58 · answer #9 · answered by Angel_like 3 · 1 1

I hardly think that it's going to make your journey any easier, another bombing would bring in the metal detectors, the stop and search and armed police at every station. It's hardly going to make your trip to work any more tolerable, why don't you see if you can change your working hours to miss out on the rush hour, it lacks the zeal of another bombing campaign but contains a more pragmatic truth.

2006-08-22 03:51:48 · answer #10 · answered by splifee 2 · 0 0

what would that achieve london has been bombed before many many times and the trains still ran they were still crowded and commutres are always going to be annoying even inside of the presoush little bubble you live in inside your moms basement.

2006-08-22 03:51:33 · answer #11 · answered by ah64dtk 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers