It was definitely loss for cricket........ but who over reacted to the situation darrell hair or inzy?

Answer 1

INZY.

HE SHOULD BRING THIS ISSUE TO MATCH REFEREE.AFTER THE MATCH.
HE HAS NO RIGHT TO STOP THE MATCH.

HE INSULTED THE SPECTATORS, UMPIRE, AND CRICKET.

Answer 2

I think Its Inzy. he could have continued played and lodged the protest later. You have to see this problem in a lrger perspective that even ig darrell was wrong, Its purely a indecipline to leave the field. If ICC allows this then every time a player is out or so, Teams will start moving out of the game. Inzy shold have waited for game to be over and lodge the complain thru proper channel.

Answer 3

•inzi was perfectly roght...he dint harm the spiirit of the game...i bet had there been any other captain...he would have walked off straight away...but inzi dint wanna insult bllody daryl hair...daryl hair is YET 2 PROVIDE EVIDNCE...and the law says that u cannto judge just by looking at the state of the ball that is has been tempered...one has 2 provide evidnce and nam a player or 2....and my point is that when cook got out...the ball was reversing and then it was in poisession of the umpires..were the umpires blind at that time...??and just in 2 overs time...they found a big scratch and accused the team of tempering...this is shameful umpiring...agree or not...but both billy and hair have always been against apakistan...i have dozens and dozens of proofs of thier biasness against team pakistan...and had that been planned...inzi would have been oprating with 2 fast bowlers rather than kaneria at one end...or did he expext kaneria 2 rverse swing the ball with the so called tempered ball?? the rules imply that if a team efuses 2 play the umpire must go 2 the captain n iform him b4 h puts the match 2 n end...but what hair did...was taht he awarded the win and went away...and if u say that hair is the man of laws...does nay1 remmeber thr run out decision at faisalabad against inzi...according to the law...he shouldnt have refred it 2 the 3rd umpire even...and what will u say upon strauss and peitersen talkin on moboile sets when the match was not called off yt!!!! were they talking 2 som booikies..?? coz i am sure had that been pakistani player talkin on mobile in the dresseing room...he would have been accusd of match fixing...bloody malcom speed is an australian...therefore hell always support hair!!! hate HAIR...hate ICC

Answer 4

I think that the blame should go to the coach Bob Wolmer and Shehar Yar Khan. They should have advised Inzi to go to the field and should have taken care of the issue of lodging the protest themselves. Inzi is a good cricketer but not well conversant with the rules due to his low education. Being the captain of Pakistan side now he has to take all the blame on behalf of Shehar Yar Khan and Wolmer.

The ICC is equally to be blamed to insist on appointing disputed and controversal umpires. ICC should have been taken an appropriate decision to appoint umpires who do not cause loss to the game of cricket.

Answer 5

Inzy

Answer 6

a million) David Shepherd. remarkable 2) Steve Bucknor. great 3) Billy Bowden. undemanding, too theatrical 4) Aleem Dar became into remarkable, yet fallen down in cutting-edge cases. 5) Simon Taufel remarkable 6) Venkatraghvan. good 7) Steve Davis good 8) Kumara Dharamsena good 9) Billy Doctrove remarkable 10) Darrell Hair remarkable, and gutsy 11) Daryl Harper known because it the way it became into.

Answer 7

It should be remembered that Hair didn't actually accuse anybody of cheating! He had a suspiscion that the ball MAY have been tampered with, and so changed it in accordance with his job requirement. He never accused anyone, didn't lodge a complaint, or report anyone. He simply changed the ball to make sure Pakistan weren't gaining an unfair advantage. Pakistan took affront to this and staged a very juvenile protest. They were more than 15 minutes late, and so, in accordance with the rules, they chose to forfeit the game - foolish! Especially as, despite Cook and Pietersen batting well, they were still in a commanding position. If they had of wanted to complain about Hair's treatment of them, the correct time was AFTER the game. They cheated the fans, if not with the ball.

Answer 8

Agreed loss for cricket...Inzy did not react enough! How dare anyone accuse him and his team of ball tampering!

Answer 9

darrell hair of course....r u thick in the head??? inzy did what any man with guts and honour would do.....i would have gone off the field as soon as they changed the ball

Answer 10

Inzi had no choice when D. Hair accused him of "cheating". He walked out of the field.

Answer 11

Darrell Hair, is known as a man who will make the hard decisions and stick by them. If they are cheating then they deserve to be punished. It happens alot like in life, you cheat, get caught you have to cop the punishment, at least he has the balls to stand up and draw a line in the sand and stick by those decisions. How rare is that.