Will NEOCONS ever take responsibility for driving our great country into the ground?
http://pulsetc.com/image/2004/1020/neocons.jpg
2006-08-22 02:57:46 · 19 answers · asked by Dr.Feelgood 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Neocons are spineless, brain washed, pathetic beings. They can never be man/woman enough to admit that the Duh-bya regime is debunked and they made a mistake in voting for him. The last 30% of the population who still support him are the most fanatic and vocal. So you don't hear the less fanatic Republicans who have stopped supporting him.
And the Osama - Clinton myth is a lie made up by Oxycontin addict Rush Limbaugh.
http://mediamatters.org/items/200408120011
http://mediamatters.org/items/200512130004
2006-08-22 04:27:50 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
It took a long time for the country to take this drive, I suspect it will take a while to get back.
Terrorism..... Carter is one factor. He did not take decisive action in the late '70s when Iran pulled its ignorant embassy crap.
Reagan did not take decisive action in '83 after the Beruit barracks bombing.
Bushelder.... attacked Iraq for the wrong reasons.... Kuwaitis sat back and let Americans and soldiers of other nations die in order to return their sheikdom to a family.
Clinton.... yes, clinton was very absent, worried he might offend.... in '93 WTC attack.... weak response.... went after the perps instead of the base of the problem.... Islamo-fascism... but maybe the world, especially the leftist part, was not ready to recognize or admit what has been going on for at least 30 years with the Islamo-fascists.... it appears that the left still doesn't want to see it as it is.
Present day Bush.... continues the failure to close the border to the illegal alien invasion.... not enough troops in Iraq, failure to secure the borders of Iraq.... then I think back to Vietnam... big problem there, yep, failure to secure the borders..... do I see a pattern with all Presidents..... ignore illegal aliens and failure to secure the border, failure to take decisive action towards Islamo-fascist... YES, I do.
2006-08-22 03:16:12 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
As long as it is true, and the truth doesn't change. Read David Hackworth's "Hazardous Duty" if you want a good picture of Clinton's "don't give a damn" attitude" and how he let America down. This was written by a military officer and decorated war hero (9 purple hearts, 10 silver stars, and the Distinguished Service Medal).
2006-08-22 03:08:12 · answer #3 · answered by senior citizen 5 · 4⤊ 1⤋
Oh, about as long as WEAK SISTERS will blame Bush the Younger, Bush the Elder, and Reagan for "the country's woes", I'd imagine.
You morons are too young to remember Dick Nixon - now THAT was a Republican worth going over with a baseball bat! We'll be paying forever considering the amount of entitlement legislation that jerk signed.
And what do you think the "answer" is, oh woeful thinker of woeful things?
2006-08-22 03:15:50 · answer #4 · answered by Walter Ridgeley 5 · 0⤊ 3⤋
They need a scapegoat and will probably keep blaming him for their woes. Its amazing how they (neocons) vote against their own best interests. But.. mainly .. most of them are the Christian ring wingers who are no better than the Taliban.
2006-08-22 03:10:35 · answer #5 · answered by a 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
No the Neocons will never take responsibility. For example, they say the entire Democratic Party, not just Clinton, is responsible for the all of the social and economic woes that affect black Americans today. I learned this from a recent Rush rant which is worth reading. This rant is remarkable not only for its blamemongering but also for its "logic".
2006-08-22 03:06:29 · answer #6 · answered by ? 5 · 2⤊ 4⤋
What did I tell you about obscure conspiracy website surfing Dr. Feelme? You find the wierdest pictures. Give me a reputable site...and I'll check it out. And I don't blame Clinton for all of the country's problems....but he was in office for 8 years in the recent past....he is responsible for NAFTA..don't forget about that.
2006-08-22 13:04:40 · answer #7 · answered by loubean 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Neocon is such a disingenuous term. First off it is meaningless as the republican party has always been conservative. The phrase neo-liberal was coined to describe the conservative democrats who, in order to curry favor with their masters at the DNC who decided post LBJ that the party will no longer tolerate anything but liberalism. The process lasted into the 1980, when Al Gore became one of the last conservative democrats to abandon his conservative foundation.
The republican party is not blaming Clinton for a strong economy and low unemployment, as a matter of fact they are taking credit for it.
2006-08-22 03:10:33 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 4⤋
For as long as you blame George Bush 2.
So how long is a googol?
2006-08-22 03:31:14 · answer #9 · answered by smitty031 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
No they will not take responsibility. They will stop blaming Clinton after he has died perhaps.
2006-08-22 03:36:11 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋