If nature abhors a vacuum, how is it, the universe could exist without any matter in it?

Question

Name a time that the universe had no matter in it. you should refuse to use that dirty BB word. A true vacuum void is impossible the container would never be strong enough to stop matter entering into the void, then how do you have right next to this impossible void all the matter in the universe coldly crammed into the size of a pea or a tardis, (Dr who fans need not reply)

"By now you should be seeing that the two cannot exist along side each other"

a pea under the extreme pressure of containing all the mass of the universe and a impossible vacuum, it is impossible because the observer contaminates the observed and it would take more than the all the energy in the universe to create and maintain.
This is all happening before energy exists? This does not take into account the energy needed to cram all the mass of the universe into our pea size tardis, where did all this energy come from before energy existed. i wish someone would pull the STRING on the BB theory.

Answer 1

Looking at it this way, BB theory is about as believable, or unbelievable, as saying God just created it. As I see it, BB theory requires just as much faith as Creation theory.

Note that there are alternative theories that do not involve BB - including steady state and fluctuating universe models (see Fred Hoyle).

Or were you talking about "Big Brother"???

Answer 2

This is a Universe Creation theory.The singularity is really an implosion of what we observe now as mass. Thought the Universe has atronomical dimensions,the actual bare bone mass volume is extremely minute compared to the Volume of the Universe.It is not the size of a golf ball as BB theory of singularity had calculated. Note its only a theory and a very interesting one.The theory would have been plausible if it would have assumed Creation as a large Number of whirlpools rather than radial expension.
Non science common sense would lead one to believe that Creation involved a construction of a space substance before mass structures could be formed.That would be a more likely scenario.

The formation of mass structures is still a puzzle even in the Big bang theory.And it offers very little explanation of what people have been inculcated as reality which they call space as a vaccum.

If some one could find a vaccum its only the absence of air and not neccesarily the abscence of temperature.

WE basically live in a Created special fluid which we do not actually understand .Just like a fish who lives in the water does not know that its made of H2 0.

Energy is the result of Power being applied on a mass structure for a determined amount ot time.

Power exists as a natural state of space and cause all the motion inside the Universe. This is due to the restrains that were put on the skin of the universe.


What is beyond that skin is beyond the Understanding of Humans at this time . Perhaps one day it would be reavealed to us.

Answer 3

relies upon on the way you view a vacuum per chance? In deep area, there are purely some molecules/atoms round. In each cubic meter per chance numerous atoms. So even many gentle years from the nearest planet/movie star etc, nevertheless there is remember floating round. The stress receives decrease and decrease (on an inverse logarithmic scale) yet will in no way actual attain 0. Having worked for a time in an marketplace that makes use of truly low vacuum pressures, i am going to vouch for the actual undeniable truth that even with the undeniable fact that not ordinary you try, "nature" will come across a fashion to both push countless the exterior molecules into the chamber, or withstand all tries to get the molecules contained in the chamber to the exterior! even with this, on a sub-atomic element, the surely volume ccupied through the protons/neutrons/electrons etc is really small in words of the dimensions of the outer electron shell. for that reason, you concentration on very nearly all the universe is vacuum, damaged sporadically through sub-atomic debris. So, on a macro element, then i wager there is vacuum that nature will in no way fill, on a commonly used element there is not any vacuum that nature received't fill and on the first, problem-free experience element, then per chance - it relies upon how a ways between man or woman atoms you concentration on to be a vacuum!

Answer 4

"A true vacuum void is impossible the container would never be strong enough to stop matter entering into the void"

You are assuming the entire universe is contained in something, which most science disagrees with. Also, if there is no matter outside of this container to be pulled in then there is no problem.

Answer 5

Listen mate,

If I carbon multiform ed the essence of the matter surrounding the air expanse form of plasmic pro ducifiing atom fathers, then we would be non the wiser, go find a girlfriend.

Answer 6

The singularity at the time of the BB was composed not matter, but energy. (E=mc2). Matter condensed out of the energy after the BB.

Answer 7

I missed the BB Theory lecture.
Steady state, string, chaos?
I guess I missed or slept through the whole class. Now I wish I hadn't.

Answer 8

Listen mate I've had a liquid lunch and I just can't be bothered.

Answer 9

the universe does have matter that is how things like the earth was created and life form duh

Answer 10

?????