Israel has nuclear weapons. How would the US help if the Israel and Iran had nuclear war?

Answer 1

Israelians are mad people. Nuclear weapons in the custody of Israel is not only hazardous for neighbouring countries, but it is dangerous for Israel itself. Israel will use the nuclear weapons against Palastene and Lebenon and the consequent result will be Israel itself will get detroyed totally along with neighbouring countries. If U.S., wanted to protect Israel, Israel should be disarmed with nuclear weapons.

Answer 2

Iraq in no way posed of mission to Israel, and Iran does not pose of mission to Israel now. Iraq in no way threatened Israel, nor did it ever fund suicide bombers. Saddam Hussein ran an earthly authorities, and non secular fundamentalists were an enemy of his. the U. S. intelligence community got here across that Iran is *not* arising nuclear guns. even with the undeniable fact that, Iran, like all states, is loose to develop nuclear power. something else of the international does not supply "token gestures," something else of the international protested the U. S. attack on Iraq, and something else of the international is really a lot hostile to any attack on Iran (Rasmussen and the NYT do polls of this). the U. S. inhabitants frequently is of the same opinion with the inhabitants of something else of the international, and is and became hostile to attacks on both Iran or Iraq. conflict is continuously good for the U. S. monetary equipment, it really is what were given us out of the full Deppression. even with the undeniable fact that, the money will be spent on something functional. the protection stress is basically a luxury sector- bullets and bombs haven't any social use. "Colony" is too good of a be conscious for Israel's relation to the U. S., yet you could call them a proxy. the U. S. on my own subsidizes Israel's monetary equipment and protection stress, and the U. S.'s disproportionate power contained in the UN protects Israel from international and humanitarian regulation.

Answer 3

There would be nothing left to help. Rope off the radioactive glass where there used be sand?

Shaheen- Israel cannot use nuclear weapons on Palestine or Lebanon. They are too close to Israel and they would destroy themselves. They are not suicidal like so many of your brethren

Answer 4

USA doesn't need to help because it would be really one sided. Israel has them, Iran does not. You do the math.

Answer 5

Would we have to help?

Israel can solve this one themselves. I hope they take Iran out. I am tired of hearing them .

Answer 6

There is increasing evidence that Israel instigated a disastrous war on Lebanon largely at the behest of the United States.

On July 30, the Jerusalem Post reported that President Bush pushed Israel to expand the war beyond Lebanon and attack Syria. Israeli officials apparently found the idea “nuts.”

This idea was not exactly secret. In support of the Israeli offensive, the office of the White House Press Secretary released a list of talking points that included reference to a Los Angeles Times op-ed by Max Boot, senior fellow for national security studies at the Council on Foreign Relations. The article, “It's Time to Let the Israelis Take Off the Gloves,” urges an Israeli attack against Syria. “Israel needs to hit the Assad regime. Hard,” argues Boot. “If it does, it will be doing Washington's dirty work.”

Iran, too, was in the administration's sights. T he Israeli attack on Lebanon, according to Seymour Hersh, was to “serve as a prelude to a potential American preemptive attack to destroy Iran's nuclear installations.” But first, the Bush administration needed to get rid of Hezbollah's capacity to retaliate against Israel in the event of a U.S. strike on Iran, which apparently prompted Hezbollah's buildup of Iranian-supplied missiles in the first place.

Starting this spring, according to Hersh, the White House ordered top planners from the U.S. air force to consult with their Israeli counterparts on a war plan against Iran that incorporated an Israeli pre-emptive strike against Hezbollah. Lieutenant General Dan Halutz, the chief of staff of the Israeli military and principal architect of the war on Lebanon, worked with U.S. officials on contingency planning for an air war with Iran.

The Bush administration's larger goal apparently has been to form an alliance of pro-Western Sunni Arab dictatorships—primarily Egypt, Saudi Arabia, and Jordan—against a growing Shiite militancy exemplified by Hezbollah and Iran and, to a lesser extent, post-Saddam Iraq. Though these Sunni regimes initially spoke out against Hezbollah's provocative capture of the two Israeli soldiers that prompted the Israeli attacks, popular opposition within these countries to the ferocity of the Israeli assault led them to rally solidly against the U.S.-backed war on Lebanon.

Answer 7

USA...will Fight for the Sake of Israel.!!!!....but...Iran is Not an Easy Enemy!!!!

Answer 8

see this please :

to answer ur question:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WbmgkCiwTKo