English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Darrel is always biased against Asian teams. Why such a person should be given the role of umpiring?

2006-08-21 22:26:24 · 15 answers · asked by judicious 1 in Sports Cricket

15 answers

why not??????? he is only the 1 creating problems!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

2006-08-22 02:04:24 · answer #1 · answered by nickless 4 · 0 2

Hey the ref made an un biased decision based on the evidence in front of him,he then consulted the other umpire on the field and then the video ref,1 might be wrong but not all 3.The Packistani team should just except the fact the got CAUGHT....Who said the umpires a racist? The only racists are those brainless enough to call him a racist..........Good on ya Darrell Hair...

2006-08-22 09:13:22 · answer #2 · answered by martinsbits2000 3 · 1 0

What a narrow minded biased approach.I am surprised that somebody obviously from the subcontinent has such an attitude.He[darryl] was NOT the only umpire there was one other on the field,one as video umpire and the match referree who i have been led to believe was a west indian.So it was a combined decision!!And by the way,murali IS a chucker!

2006-08-22 05:38:59 · answer #3 · answered by jb1 4 · 0 1

ICC must take some serious action otherwise its going to be a routine and If Pakistan protested in an improper manner (that they went out of the ground) then at the same time they had been charged without an allegation i.e.: the umpire had no proof whatsoever.

2006-08-22 07:56:31 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Darrel was an umpire for ODI the decision of withdrawing for pakistan is paving the for winning (1st ODI against India) for the Test match their dhalls was not cooked properly. Hence they must punish.

2006-08-22 06:25:45 · answer #5 · answered by JJ 4 · 0 0

Com on man hitler was a great leader,he did't believe on such petty stuff,as far i am concerned i am pretty sure hitler would try darrel hair had hitler been the Fuherer(and i have studied history)..

And i think he should be allowed to be the umpire so when pakistanis want to kill him they can find him easily..

ICC should be overhauled..
there is a lot of bias and fishy decisions which need to be enquired(including match fixing and attempts to stop match fixing)...

2006-08-22 07:04:08 · answer #6 · answered by Ali 5 · 0 2

If they stopped cheating he wouldn't be biased would he ?

He should be given the role of umpire because he follows the rules and is not intimidated by anyone !

2006-08-22 06:58:34 · answer #7 · answered by jaggles 3 · 1 2

i Dont think hair do theworng thing he is right in any condition a cricket team must agree the umpire decision it is a rule pakistan didnot follow that rule.

2006-08-22 07:41:59 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

No,It will make insecurity in the mind of umpire to take a bold decision.

2006-08-22 05:32:31 · answer #9 · answered by P5 2 · 0 2

well there should be an unbiased hearing from the ICC and if Hair is proved to be wrong he should get banned for couple of months.

2006-08-22 17:53:11 · answer #10 · answered by nuwanusa 5 · 0 1

he should keep away from asian matches

2006-08-23 19:44:23 · answer #11 · answered by Dead 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers