What do the Taliban, Saddam, Bin Laden, Iran, the Contra's all have in commen? They were armed, trained, and financed by conservatives. Good going inbreds.
2006-08-21 19:17:43 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
to homemaker. Why are you stupid enough to answer the question?
2006-08-21 19:41:52 · update #1
to varsdebater. We did sell Bin Laden weapons moron. He and his group the mujahadin now known as Al-Qaeda got weapons up the butt from America.
2006-08-21 19:44:00 · update #2
Hpyhomemaker: Not a leftist view. That is fact, or do you not remember Reagan's Iran-Contra Scandal?
2006-08-21 19:25:32 · answer #1 · answered by linus_van_pelt68 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
It was an indirect act. Al Qaeda was created by Osama bin Laden and the only reason that it's connection related to the United States was because of our influence in the Middle East. We didn't arm Al Qaeda. We sold weapons to Iran so that we could bring the hostages home, and the money from the weapon's sales went to the Contras who were fighting for freedom in Nicaragua. They were good at the time, but of course succumbed to a dictatorship after their goal was achieved.
The funny thing, we're fighting terrorism now and who's defending the terrorists? The liberals. They believe that even though terrorists are bloodthirsty extremists they should still have every right like the next innocent American. They are defending Saddam Hussein currently, who is an awful person almost equivalent to Hitler himself and who did aid terrorists and Al Qaeda namely.
2006-08-21 19:38:23 · answer #2 · answered by varsdebater_conservative 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
the united stateswon't be helpiing the enemies out, the united statesfrequently help the less prevalent ingredient who're greater receptive to united stateswishes so that's interior the Americas' suited desires. Syria could be greater advantageous off if the greater prevalent chief / party destroys much less prevalent opposition and this could be in Syria's suited pastimes, yet with united statesmeddling, the greater prevalent ingredient do no longer fairly have complete administration. If the rebels win, they are going to be in ability and that they're going to purchase hands from the U.S. The hands marketplace is an fairly worthwhile marketplace and the united statesis a huge business enterprise of that. offering hands to the enemies is robust corporation and additionally the enemies are nonetheless no longer able to protecting against an united statesinvasion so the united statescan only approximately eliminate any chief or party from ability and placed any representive they please.
2016-11-05 08:55:52 · answer #3 · answered by sturms 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It seems that the warmongers can't figure out how to make money except through selling arms, starting fights, and then selling more arms.
As a result, they are loathe to engage themselves or their families (or even friends) in military service, as all the ordnance being fired at our guys was sold by our military vendors.
2006-08-21 19:28:25 · answer #4 · answered by nora22000 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
you mean like selling ballistic missle guidance technology to the north Koreans???
OOOPS that was Bill Clinton!!
My Bad!!
2006-08-21 20:24:18 · answer #5 · answered by Dear Blabby 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Why do liberals post their opinions in the form of a question just so they can spout their leftist views?
2006-08-21 19:22:05 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
Wrong again bonzo. You've never gotten one right yet have you?
2006-08-21 19:30:27 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
finally an intelectual
2006-08-21 19:25:02 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
And what's your point.
2006-08-21 19:27:00 · answer #9 · answered by billlucas14all 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋