everything revolves around the self....thus the connotation it being the focal point of all human knowledge. life, love, pain, suffering, etc... all of these are interacting within one's self. knowing thyself therefore is the basic knowledge, the why's, who's, what's, how's.... they all sprout out from within. knowledge thereby grows from within - the initial reaction, the initial impression, the initial emotions... without thyself as the focal point, no reasoning can be attained.
hope this would be enough.... ciao...
2006-08-21 19:18:02
·
answer #1
·
answered by VeRDuGo 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
The " Self " is God, the "Self" is the ground of reality, the "Self" is the root of your conscience mind .... soon physics and ' string theory' will understand that the harmonic vibrations in the 'strings' are made up of something smaller and larger at the same time not particles or strings but mind ... pure thought. Beyond our brains .. the pure thought that our brains emulate. No religion intended ... just fact as we understand it now.
The self that one of your very intelligent answerer's mentioned is what most people focus on. Ego which is a natural but limited view of our own life and relationships ... which can bring great misunderstanding. Ego is not the Self it is the self.
Thanks for the question;
Jonnie
2006-08-21 19:55:12
·
answer #2
·
answered by Jonnie 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
"The self" is created out of that knowledge. The knowledge what you have can be subdivided into Perceptions, feelings, reflex, intelligence, thoughts. Take each seperately and analyse. Nothing got an existence by itself. All are interconnected in the functionality of "Mind" then a continuous process of thought, gives a false impression of "self". Those who could come out of the influence of thought also could come out of the "self" centeredness, also become an enlightened being. So to conclude. Self is basically "no self". No self is the true self. True self is "the self".
2006-08-21 19:22:13
·
answer #3
·
answered by r_govardhanam 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
it depends if you are taking a realist or an idealist point of view. A realist such as Machiavelli would argue that the self is the central reference point due to its nature, or its self interest.
An idealist such as Plato would argue that the self is not the central point because the self of a person is still not the true essence of what a perfected or idealistic self would be.
2006-08-27 08:08:51
·
answer #4
·
answered by gm 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
Is the 'self' not the observer of the 'mind' gaining knowledge as the person goes through life?
2006-08-27 14:05:20
·
answer #5
·
answered by fruitbat7711 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
For all people, the self is the individual spark of the person that defines how it relates to all experiences and relates to all knowledge and retains all memory, physical, psychological and perceptual.
2006-08-26 14:01:38
·
answer #6
·
answered by Lance U 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
Yes, because the central reference point of your question is "all human knowledge".
2006-08-21 19:07:56
·
answer #7
·
answered by Tuna-San 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
Yes. One cannot measure something without a reference point.
2006-08-27 21:42:15
·
answer #8
·
answered by thrag 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
no, not at all, the self is just one part of human mind, there is also the ego, the super-ego, and the super-self, and we are still talking only about the human mind, he haven´t gone out of it yet, so I would say there is more than that to human knowledge
2006-08-21 19:15:52
·
answer #9
·
answered by wisdom is my signature 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
Yeah sounds good, just use that.
2006-08-21 19:07:29
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋