whats more of a loss generals that can protect the naton or a few thousand civlians.
honestly why am i so wrong in thinking this?
2006-08-21 14:23:45 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Other - Society & Culture
9/11/01 whoops
2006-08-21 14:28:56 · update #1
lol your all funny!
2006-08-21 14:36:28 · update #2
Well aren't all attacks to US civilians/military/soil devastating?
2006-08-21 14:30:15 · answer #1 · answered by House, M.D. 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Maybe they hate it because you got the date wrong - 9/11/01. More importantly, no human being is worth more than another. The life of an innocent child destroyed at the World Trade Center should be grieved as much as that of a military commander in the Pentagon. Should the mother of the murdered child grieve less than the wife of the military commander?
2006-08-21 21:40:50 · answer #2 · answered by TJMiler 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Are you serious? Do you know how many people died at the WTC, compared to how many died at the Pentagon? Why are we even comparing deaths, it shouldn't have happened, innocent people are dead now and all you can do and ask which was more devastating?
You are so sad. Get a life.
2006-08-21 21:35:25 · answer #3 · answered by Agent Double EL 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well, there are more photos and film of the WTC buildings, while most of the Pentagon destruction was below ground.
2006-08-21 21:30:38 · answer #4 · answered by Sal G 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well, it could be that you don't think before you speak anymore than you proof before you hit send. There aren't 99 days in September and to the best of my knowledge, never have been.
2006-08-21 21:36:49 · answer #5 · answered by swarr2001 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
cuz hundreds of people died in the wtc... duh. An event that has more casualties is usually considered more devastating, even though both are horrible. Just like the bombs in Nagasaki and Hiroshima are considered more devastating than 9/11, at least to the Japanese. Americans seem to think they deserved it... just like some Arabs seem to think we deserved it...
2006-08-21 21:41:58 · answer #6 · answered by candy 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's 9/11, that might be your first clue!
2006-08-21 21:31:39 · answer #7 · answered by Carey 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I have to agree, no one attack was worse. If one was worse, that would have to make the other better. Do you really think of it that way? We were attacked. Period.
2006-08-21 21:32:01 · answer #8 · answered by PoPo's Ho 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think if you were to ask the families of the people killed in NYC you would understand why you are wrong. What a jerk!!!!!!!
2006-08-21 21:32:06 · answer #9 · answered by vadragonslayer 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why split hairs. It was ALL terrible!!!
2006-08-21 21:31:49 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋