The murder of innocent civilians is not justified under any circumstances, but there are situations in war where civilians will die, especially if one side is using them as human shields. Neither American nor Israeli policy is specifically designed to kill non-combatants. The same cannot be said about the Islamic terrorists.
Is it, then, your contention that the defense of Muslim countries should involve the wholesale murder of civilians, as in the case of the attack on the World Trade Center?
In so far as I know, no one died in Abou Ghraib, so I'm not sure what your point is.
2006-08-21 14:11:11
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
America is not in the business of killing civilians! And Abu Ghraib is not even a legitimate example of your argument. While the so-called torture at the Abu-Ghraib prison was appalling, those who were responsible were punished. Besides, in EVERY war your gonna have some civilian casualties. Tragic, but often unavoidable. And that's not counting the propaganda coming from the terrorists who's sole function is to kill innocent civilians. Besides, if American forces wanted to kill civilians there woudn't be any left at this point.
And as for the Israelis, they have a right to defend their country too. Especially from murderous Hezbollah terrorists who want to destroy them. Not only that, the Israeli forces are not killing "innocent" civilians. If you are helping and hiding terrorists in your homes, I don't feel sorry for you when the missile hits.
2006-08-21 14:21:12
·
answer #2
·
answered by Kevnology 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Why do people like you post questions and then not even answer the people that put answers. Why is Muslim killing Muslim in Iraq considered a good thing. What kind of person are you to approve this stuff. Your own Muslim terrorists are killing way more people than the Americans, and the Isarlis are not doing anything but defending themselves..
2006-08-21 17:12:37
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Why don't you explain to the room how ATTACKING the world trade centers was Defending there land. Or how about Attacking the USS cole which was Simply refueling. Or attacking our foreign embassies. FUNNY you mention the Killing of Innocent civilians. Why don't you explain to me why MUSLIMS in Iraq opened fire on other Muslims in an Open Market. Who were they defending against by Killing Fellow Iraqi's? I'll Look forward to you posting your answers to these questions.
2006-08-21 14:16:59
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
How do possibly equate crashing jumbo jets into the World Trade Centers with Muslims defending their country !!?? Since when have suicide bombings of innocent people been considered defending your country!!?? These Islamic Fascists have an agenda - and it's NOT defending their country.
2006-08-21 14:11:38
·
answer #5
·
answered by LeAnne 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Why aren't you talking about the people who strap on bombs and kill civilians ON PURPOSE. Why aren't you talking about the people who video BEHEADINGS WITH SWORDS!
Abu Grab was horrible, but this is nothing to the behavior of these pigs over centuries!
I will take these complaints and accusations seriously when I see mobs on the "Arab street" protesting the beheading of some unarmed reporter! I will CONSIDER your view when I hear voices raised against the idiotic, sacrilegious, monstrous practice of "suicide bombing".
AbuGrab was CHILDPLAY compared to the mass genocide Saddam perpetrated on the Kurds. But I didn't hear a WORD from the you righteous folks about THAT.
2006-08-21 14:16:28
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Because they are narrow minded conservatives who haven't thought that mulim isn't always connected with terrorism. In fact its just the rare few times, and the middle east. It is just an alternate way of life. Muslims do have to realize that short shorts and vibrant colors and being able to see a nice face is also another way of life and respect that too though.
2006-08-21 14:04:52
·
answer #7
·
answered by Matt D 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
Killing civillians on purpose is not defending your country. The insurgents in Iraq fight the American allies, which is why they are called insurgents. When they attack civillians on purpose, they are terrorists. Either way, you can't defend anything by setting off bombs in crowded markets.
2006-08-21 14:05:00
·
answer #8
·
answered by Darcia 3
·
2⤊
0⤋
It remember me a World War II movie. The french resistance blew some railway tracks and the German said «Oh, these terrorists again». Terrorists are always on the other side.
2006-08-21 14:05:54
·
answer #9
·
answered by Joseph Binette 3
·
2⤊
1⤋
They are called terrorist because they go, hidden, to other countries, plant bombs, kill people and leave (if they can), being "going to other countries" the operative word
2006-08-21 14:07:03
·
answer #10
·
answered by class4 5
·
1⤊
0⤋