Nobody, I would just like people to know that i could, at anytime, anyplace!
2006-08-21 13:36:11
·
answer #1
·
answered by bung_7250 2
·
2⤊
0⤋
I would eradicate the person who falsely tried to sue my small business. They created a fictional situation and attempted to make it a 'true story' (i have to be vague...you never know they may try to sue me for malicious intent, threatening behaviour or something). I had to hire a lawyer just to represent my business which in the end never reached court but it cost me a hell of a lot of time and about $10K. That was my paycheck for 5 months! The whole debacle brought about the creation of company policies and a very nervous business that is trying to keep on with the American dream.
2006-08-21 16:40:41
·
answer #2
·
answered by blue boy 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
It wouldn't make sense. It's a serious thing to eradicate somebody. Law and justice have to be put in play. Judgement must be beyond the shadow of a doubt with evidence being overwhelming. Sentence must be carried out flawlessly with extreme prejudice. Given the number of people utterly, joyously in the wrong, it calls for a far higher agency than anything we know. But we know it will take place.
2006-08-21 13:36:48
·
answer #3
·
answered by vanamont7 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
"in the journey that they say 'purely God. I in ordinary words trust contained in the single God,' I’ll talk about that they are almost as atheistic as me. I don’t position self belief in 2,870 gods, and they don’t position self belief in 2,869"... it is really humor and genuinely not something properly worth talking about in a religious talk. this is fairly language and it type of feels to have really an outcome on you. i extremely favor to understand why it is, and every time I ask a similar element, I continuously get the cop-out reply, "The Bible tells us he's the single actual God," or something to that outcome. i favor to understand, barring connection with the Bible (because you could not use the time period contained in the definition with each little thing else, why could faith be any diverse?), why your god is extra valid than the 1000's of different gods that existed formerly and characteristic existed in view that. there's a level to be made the following even with the undeniable fact that this is genuinely lost in all the ... once back, fairly language. the point is do purely you've faith in God and if so then why. once you do then you truthfully favor to say what God are you going to position self belief in. What one provides the solutions on your questions. this is the position i am going to argue with you the benefits of the God of the Bible hostile to all different gods. It genuinely could be an extremely particular element. it really is going to be a serious project and in no way some ordinary answer to a flippant question from a sarcastic comic. it is existence and absence of existence the following. Get serious.
2016-11-30 23:19:19
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
George W. Bush. He's a very dangerous person and he has the power to do bad things. He is dishonest and lies to the people he serves. He is responsible for thousands and thousands of innocent women and children being killed as well as 2,600 US military men and women being killed in a senseless war that we should not even be involved in. Who appointed the US as police for the world?
2006-08-21 13:39:01
·
answer #5
·
answered by EMAILSKIP 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Obi Wan Tater Tot
2006-08-21 13:36:03
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 2
·
2⤊
1⤋
North Korean dictator
2006-08-21 13:36:19
·
answer #7
·
answered by maxima 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
choices, choices, choices... no matter who i chose, i'd feel a little bad about destroying a life... but if i had to choose, it would be someone who had caused a lot of pain to society... if i had to choose someone (not knowing their name, age, sex, or ethnicity) then it would be the worst sex offender in the world... i would want to obliterate them off the face of the earth... then i think i could sleep at night knowing i made the world a little better.
2006-08-21 13:39:17
·
answer #8
·
answered by kiss my wookie! 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
My ex husband. He isn't a good dad. He doesn't even see his kids. Doesn't pay child support and then he claims that he is a great dad!! Tell me how a guy who has seen his kids 3 days since Jan 1st is a good dad?? Yeah I choose him!
2006-08-21 13:36:59
·
answer #9
·
answered by browneyegirl 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
George Bush or Cindy Sheehan. This world would be much less annoying with either one gone
2006-08-21 13:36:26
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
President Bush,because he's a jerk whose trying to take away the rights of certain Americans because of who they love. Tell me if I'm wrong,but I'm pretty sure there's something about life,liberty and the PURSUIT OF HAPPINESS...how are homosexuals supposed to be happy if we can't marry the person we love!
2006-08-21 13:37:19
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋