Dude no offense but this team out of 10 is at most a 3.
Your Qb's aren't good fantasy guys as Plummer is seriously battling to even retain his starting job and Vick is not a high fantasy QB.
Your WR are stacked with Smith and Moss but Horn and Toomer won't draw you a top back. Even Moss probably won't get you a significant back. Maybe a starter on a lousy team like a Davis or Gore.
RB you are totally screwed and will probably lose the pool on this alone. You have currently one starter with Jones and with Martz in Detroit expect them to throw the ball more anyway. Bell could be good if he ends up winning the job but it doesn't look likely and White and Faulk are backups currently and probably won't have that much fantasy value if any.
Heath Miller was a good pick at TE and Vernon DAvis might make an impact but at least one will be on your bench probably so no point in having two good players.
K-not bad but not near the top.
D- Fairly week and probably barely a top 10 in imo.
All in all I think even by trading Smith and Moss for RB's you are in trouble and it will be a long season.
NTM you are probably a falcons fan right?
2006-08-22 03:24:43
·
answer #1
·
answered by CJ B 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Tatum Bell is an interesting pick. I would trade Moss for a RB since people still think he is good for some reason. The quarterbacks are not elite so not a great grade there. Overall I would give it a C.
2006-08-21 13:23:55
·
answer #2
·
answered by BILL J 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
QB: Start Vick. He is a good scrambler and he worked hard with his wide receivers in the off season.
WR: You're good.
TE: Miller will play a major role for the Steelers this season. Expect him to be the go to guy in the red zone.
K: A top 5 kicker good pick
DEF: This was where you dropped the ball. Atlanta is a mediocre defense (19th in the league out of 32 teams) you could have done better there.
2006-08-22 02:41:14
·
answer #3
·
answered by zac y 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
this could be a rather sturdy team all-around. Bledsoe and Manning will make a good matchup platoon at quarterback, yet be careful who you start up off them against. Deuce McAllister continues to be a great working returned, and Reggie Bush won't substitute that certainty. Tomlinson is, for my section, 2d only to Shaun Alexander in terms of working backs. this is needed to computer screen the waiver cord to attempt and %. up yet another returned, because of the fact Mike Anderson is somewhat a attain. save an eye fixed on DeAngelo Williams of Carolina and Jerious Norwood of Atlanta. Your receiving corps is right, whether Deion branch may well be in trouble. i admire Fitzgerald and Galloway, and Moulds might have a great season once you have out of Buffalo. Antonio Gates is one among my popular gamers, and gets you greater delusion factors than maximum huge receivers. Rackers is a sturdy kicker, and your defenses might desire to have great matchups, somewhat Chicago's.
2016-10-02 09:23:10
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
not too bad.
You need upgrades at both QB and RB. Players I would use for trade bait: Vick, Moss, Toomer, Bennett, Bell, White.
2006-08-21 14:55:55
·
answer #5
·
answered by choonmengat 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
it sucks you should have drafted a RB instead of Smith and you should have drfted somebody other than Moss because Brroks is his QB
2006-08-21 13:18:56
·
answer #6
·
answered by Flash 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Good exept your rb's Kevin Jones is the only one that will play.
2006-08-21 13:25:44
·
answer #7
·
answered by Evan Y 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
This team is a "C" at best!
2006-08-21 16:52:51
·
answer #8
·
answered by heat_mizor 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think you're gonna get worked.
2006-08-21 21:22:20
·
answer #9
·
answered by baseballfan 4
·
0⤊
0⤋