Be honest, no one will get upset. Why did america believe this man?
2006-08-21 11:50:12 · 23 answers · asked by Coach53 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
I never did as a Democrat. I didn't and would never have voted for him with other better qualified GOP candidates that could have ran for President. They don't have any excuses.
2006-08-21 11:58:10 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 3⤋
It is not about 9/11, it is about terrorism and ISLAMOFASCISM.
On 9/14/2001 the House voted 420 to 1 and the Senate voted 98 to 2 to have the President pursue terrorists that seek to kill Americans whereever they might be. That point alone makes your argument mute.
There has been absolute proof of Iraqs role with Al Queda and terrorism training.
On the vote for going to war in Iraq, the house voted 296 to 133 and the senate voted 77 to 23 to go in and take out Hussein.
Why do Americans not believe this man?
2006-08-25 06:57:32 · answer #2 · answered by rmagedon 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Are you aware that President Clinton had made plans to take Saddam out way before 9/11. Many reasons were given for the war in Iraq. Saddam was a brutal dictator who threatened the region, killed thousands of his own people, funded terrorists, violated the 1991 cease-fire agreement numerous times, and ignored UN security council resolutions. You thought it was all about 9/11, nothing else?
2006-08-21 12:01:02 · answer #3 · answered by slyry75 3 · 3⤊ 0⤋
once you're so hectic approximately lives, no longer oil, then think of of what happens if we abandon Iraq. The oil fields, which Iraq is predicated upon, would be sabotaged and the proceeds will finance the terrorist front. With our help, the Iraqis are rebuilding their protection forces and infrastructure. what share lives would be lost in Iraq via fact we left them interior the midst of a conflict? Do they be counted? what share lives do we lose right here interior the States via fact we did no longer end the conflict against enthusiast Muslims over there? Iraq is our best pal. the U. S. works with different countries protecting against worry-loose enemies. Our troops are effective lives. Defeating the enemy is their interest. you're spinning to cover up Kerry's dumb fact.
2016-11-05 08:18:52 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
We all know that 9/11 wasn't the cause of the war in Iraq. So Bush never had to admit anything. 9/11 started the war on terrorism. We went to Iraq because we thought they had weapons of mass destruction. Next time try checking your facts before you make even more of an idiot of yourself.
2006-08-21 11:59:02 · answer #5 · answered by Luekas 4 · 5⤊ 1⤋
I maintain that 500 artillery shells containing nerve gas, mustard gas, and Sarin gas, plus a dozen steel drums full of chemical warfare agents, plus 450,000 tons of high explosives constitutes weapons of mass destruction in anybody's book. We have all seen the photos in the newspapers. What you may not have seen, and I can no longer provide, is a series of photos of our army corps of engineers digging two Mach-2 Russian Fox-Bat fighters out of the sand where Iraqi forces had apparently buried them. I doubt if those photos were ever turned over to the media. Who knows what else is buried in the Iraqi desert or smuggled over the border to Syria? My vote isn't changing.
2006-08-21 12:05:56 · answer #6 · answered by senior citizen 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Americans were so stunned that they would have listened to satan. The shock is starting to wear off and slowly but surely we coming around.
I never bought his rhetoric but when your a s s is surrounded by alligators you're reluctantly to speak.
Bush has had them mesmerized ever since 9/11. HYPNOTIZED would be a better word.
When Bush says that a pink elephant is running around the room,they all chime in yes a pink elephant - and with relish!
2006-08-21 12:04:56 · answer #7 · answered by worriedaboutyou 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋
What did Pearl Harbor have to do Japanese imperialism in China or NAZI aggression in Poland? No we won't vote for gutless traitors like Edwards, Dodd or Hillary.
2006-08-21 12:04:49 · answer #8 · answered by Hank 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Because he play that scenerio to death. No wmd's, thousands in jail at Gitmo. Iraq a mess. He needed a new act ,Nucleeer danger from Iran.
2006-08-21 17:23:55 · answer #9 · answered by saltydog 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
That's new to me, never heard that statement before. Not surprising though, since he couldn't make up his mind whether he was invading that country for 9/11, WMDs, or liberating the people of Saddam.
2006-08-21 12:01:48 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
I hope so and he also admitted there we're no WMD in Iraq. With all these misleading things you would think Bush would step down, He's Freeing people who hate us with the life's of our service men and women.
2006-08-21 12:00:44 · answer #11 · answered by Buddy 2 · 0⤊ 3⤋