could be possible end with the terrorism in usa if democrats win the election???

Question

and are democrats against the war in iraq?? .. and who do you think probably will be the new president? .

Answer 1

Terrorism will stop when either all non-Muslims are dead or all Muslim extremist are dead. My money is on killing ALL the Muslim extremist. Not all Muslims, all Muslim extremist. This may not happen in my lifetime, but it will happen. In between this happening, a hand full of general wacko extremist of no certain persuasion will have to go the same way.

I say this because there is no negotiation with any group that will only accept your death as their part of a compromise.

Answer 2

The biggest terrorist are those people that say if a Democrat gets in office we are all going to be reading the Koran or all dead,get a grip people,nothing really changes in 2008 when the Democrats will take over the White House and Bushes war,hes made it impossible to walk away from his war.Diplomatic attempts will be tried by different people,we as a country will survive and still be America with all its opinionated mouthy people that I love,we wont be over run by extremist or any one .America is stronger than just a president in an office,it transcends all this political BS.We are here with Bush ,and we will be here in 2008 with a Democrat in that same office.Stop talking about the world as we know it will disappear ,it wont ,we will survive all because we are Americans first,Republicans and Democrats second.

Answer 3

The democrats stance (if this is really their stance) is to go get the terrorists where they are, but that would include the invasion of many sovereign countries. That would really make those countries mad and would only cause greater problems.

If you look at Bill Clinton's stance on terrorists (former democrat), you'll find that it did not do any thing to stop repeated attacks in the world.

I hope the next president will be former NY mayor Rudi Guillioni. He's our best hope.

Answer 4

No possible way to end terrorism. Doesn't matter who is in office.

The "war on terrorism" is marketing phrase. A new administration might change the focus, and might use better strategies, but it won't make the underlying problem go away.

As far as Iraq, why we're staying has nothing to do with why we might have gone in the first place. Once that obvious distinction is recognized, our elected officials might decide to base their decisions on the current situation now, as opposed to what was going on 3-5 years ago.

That all being said, I don't think either the Democrats or the Republicans are an answer to the current problem. Too many of both groups seem more concerned with bashing the other, and less with solving actual problems. But the solution is the same.

Ignore party. Find a candidate (individual person) who supports what you want to see accomplished. Make an informed decision, not based on political affiliation, but based on the qualities of the individual. Or, when in doubt, skip both of the current headline parties and rally for someone who actually wants to focus on the merits of the problems that we're facing.

Answer 5

There were more domestic terrorist attacks in this country when Bill Clinton was president than after George Bush was elected.

Consider - under Clinton we had the WTC in 93 and Oklahoma City in 95. Someone also crashed a small plane into the White House and another man was arrested by the Secret Service after spraying the building with automatic rifle fire. Under President Bush we were attacked in 01, that's it... Sorry kids, facts are facts...

Answer 6

No, I don't think so. Bush went over there with a big stick, and stirred up a hornets nest. Lets just hope whoever gets the job next time, has some brains and lots of diplomacy. There is not a chance that a Republican will be elected again, or should I say appointed again.

Answer 7

If democrats win the election it's all about apologies and if it feels good do it. It will be down hill. They will through money at the terrorists and hope they go away. Because the rich get richer and the poor well that's just to bad. They'll just hand the keys to America. Look at Hollywood and what happened it. Down hill copy cats with absolutely no morals. America is the counter part of Sodam and Gamorah. If God does not judge us then he owes S and D an apology. Remember God has always made a judgment when the children were killed. Look how freely we aboard babies. He will use our enemies to achieve his goals. It is prophesied in the bible.

Answer 8

Highly doubtful. As such, terrorists simply want to destroy america, changing a president won't influence the matters as much, unless it leads to some arab being in power.
Granted, if Hillary Clinton takes the presidency, it's rumored she's softer on muslim actions, and as well, would probably cater to their demands to abandon Israel, but as well, congress and the people would probably butcher her for it.
plus, we had terrorism when the former Clinton was in office, they blew up two embassies, and hit the WTC the first time....the second time, they used planes.
I doubt the dems will sweep all three branches of goverment in an election, but I doubt the next president will be a republican....Iraq's got issues....mostly, he should admit he was trying to finish what his dad wasn't allowed to do....or should have done in the first place.
I'd pit McCain, vs Clinton, in the election

Answer 9

Of course not, Democrats are just as guilty as Republicans when it comes to perpetuating and participating in terrorism. The two parties are just figure heads on a very corrupt system that thrives on exploitation and various other forms of hegemony. Your best bet is to not vote for either party and to let the powers that be know your tired of taking the fall for their mistakes, and take the power back and give it to the people.

Answer 10

hell no,,,, terrorism has a problem for many years,,, the Hezbollah attack US Marine Barracks in Lebanon in 1983 when Reagan CUT AND RUN,, but George W Bush was the president asleep at the wheel on 9-11