I sure do.
2006-08-21 10:31:18 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Government
They won't be resolved.
But if Congress starts getting its collective {deleted} in gear, then maybe we can start getting some of the problems resolved.
And that's more dependent on getting rational problem-solving people into office than what party they might have been sponsored by.
2006-08-21 10:40:23 · answer #1 · answered by coragryph 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
No President Bush did make a effort to help the Middle East War.
We should support out troops and finish the mission to secure the land. They are blowing each other up daily and are in need of security by their own nation. If we pull out now the problem will get worst and follow us to the homeland. They did ask for our assistance to take down their dominated leaders and to help rebuild and secure their new goverment. We did go on a aid mission as well as homeland security to get those who put us in danger of 911 and rid their playground of mass destruction weapons they said they had. I am a Democrat by my parents choice of course but I feel The President understands our needs and Religious views. If Democrats get in office we will have problems that can not quickly be resolved. It is like I can not hit you just say Im Sorry and walk away. zip I have to repair and restore and help you back on your feet so you can stand alone and balance well. We need to see that for the Middle East.
2006-08-21 11:10:24 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
No President Bush did make a attempt to help the middle East conflict. we ought to continuously help out troops and end the challenge to maintain the land. they're blowing one yet another up on a daily basis and are in want of protection through their own united states. If we pull out now the problem receives worst and persist with us to the position of start. They did ask for our innovations to take down their ruled leaders and to help rebuild and shelter their new goverment. We did bypass on a help challenge besides as position of start protection to get those who positioned us at risk of 911 and rid their playground of mass destruction guns they reported that they had. i'm a Democrat through my mum and dad decision of direction yet i think The President is popular with our needs and religious perspectives. If Democrats get in workplace we would have issues that may no longer immediately be resolved. that is like i visit't hit you basically say Im Sorry and walk away. zip I easily ought to fix and fix and help you decrease back on your ft so that you'll be able to stand on my own and stability properly. we ought to make certain that for the middle East.
2016-11-26 21:51:10 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I consider myself a democrat but unfortunately I don't think they will solve all our problems.
When people stop being blind and deaf and ignorant of what is actually happening beyond their personal space, then perhaps some problems will be solved. Until then, we are stuck with the choice of the lesser of two evils and the hope that sooner or later people wake up and take responsibility for the responisbilities involved in their citizenship.
2006-08-21 10:40:25 · answer #4 · answered by sgirlfab 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
the two parties are the same and represent 4% of the people
both parties are rich-men's clubs and are traitors to america's survival and good
love of overpay is the root of all our problems
limit fortunes as the founding fathers did
unlimited fortunes is unjust, ie, theft, is overpower, ie, is tyranny and corruption
contribution to the wealth of a nation by any one person is limited - so fortunes should be limited
fortunes should be limited to the maximum a person can contribute to the nation by his work, ie US$2 million [2006 dollars]
ie, everyone should get out of the social pool of wealth as much as they put in, no more no less
there are no sound reasons for higher than average hourly pay - or for lower
there are many sound reasons for equal hourly pay, including justice, survival of the state, revival of liberty and democracy
2006-08-21 19:59:07 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The democrats hide their head in their ***.
http://www.freedomagenda.com/iraq/wmd_quotes.html
They've done nothing but blow hot air up the country's ***. The terror attacks grew more fierce, and what did Clinton do? He Dodged reality yet AGAIN and gave us 9/11. In Somalia, he emboldened the enemy. Cut-and-run resolves no problems.
2006-08-21 10:54:30 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Yes finally we can finally get rid of all this resolution and action and turn it into bureaucratic drivel, help the terrorist and their supporting countries operate unattended and get nothing done for 4 years....at which the Repubs will come in and clean everything up again....
2006-08-21 11:03:28 · answer #7 · answered by Gurn B 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I have a question. Do you know that you are ignorant? There are plenty of Democrats in office who are doing NOTHING!
2006-08-21 10:40:16 · answer #8 · answered by curious caucasian 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Clinton left this country far better off than he found it! He has an IQ twice that of Bush!
Bush has destroyed this country and our reputation! No one can be as bad as he is!
All of our problems will never be solved, unless some idiot in the white house decides to launch some nukes!
2006-08-21 10:41:51 · answer #9 · answered by cantcu 7 · 1⤊ 3⤋
I'm a Democrat and I don't think so, but at least they may admit there mistakes.
2006-08-21 10:48:24 · answer #10 · answered by Zen 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋