Would you rather be happy yet slow-witted and unimaginative or unhappy yet bright and creative?

Question

For example,would you rather live the life of a brilliant yet tortured artist such as Vincent van Gogh, or that of ahappy but carefree soul who is a bit simple-minded? This is a serious research question and i need as many honest answers as possible,thanks ill send you the results if you like///

Answer 1

I don't know what it would be like to be carefree and simple-minded. I am creative and bright, but not totally unhappy. I have tortured moments, or even periods, but I'd say I am 'doing pretty well' most of the time with short periods of happiness and rare glimmers of euphoria.

I wouldn't trade my intellect for more happiness, but I'd like more happiness.

Your assumption is black and white and it doesn't fit reality.

Answer 2

i'm what i'm, and that i won't be able to be what i'm no longer. I easily ought to and could be at liberty with regardless of i'm, no matter if slow or quick. in case you want what you already are, happiness and contentedness is the biproduct. that is a paradox to ask "might want to you be witty and unhappy" because the happiness is totally as a lot because the man, and is no longer inherent in stupidity or wit. even with the undeniable fact that the question does evaluate in what regard creativity and wit are taken through the man's conception equipment. this question might want to certainly generate a moderate time/area paradox in some human beings and crash the entire social equipment............and it really is no longer the first time I see it in right here. i visit't settle on no matter if the question is stupid or very surprising. Edit: you're a jew, you likely comprehend issues i do not so i wager it really is the latter.

Answer 3

Personally, I'd rather be happy. But I'd argue that we aren't here for our own happiness. We are here to serve those in needs, propagate humanity, and be temporary caretakers of mother earth.