English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I strongly feel that the older a woman gets, the more jewelty and embellishments she wears, especially as you go up the income scale. Teens and college kids prob are more into piercings or
ankle bracelets at most. As you get into the 30's and 40's, you
see the rings and earings, embellished by diamonds. At 60+,
you see veritable showcases of jewelry, especially as you go up the income scale, almost literally covered with diamonds from head to toe. The upper class socialite can be seen with a whole
display of tieras, necklaces, earings, large palatine crosses,
bracelets from wrist to elbow over her suede gloves, and brooches
wherever room can be had on the body proper.
Again, my question is, is this just to make up for lost youth?
If so, is this a progressive thing as a woman ages? And why?
How could the glitter of a D-flawless diamond ever make up for the lost charms of youth? Is the sense of aging too much to
bear without the adornment of jewelry?

2006-08-21 08:15:10 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Beauty & Style Fashion & Accessories

5 answers

I love jewelry and I have been told I accessorize well. I am near 40, but continually shock others when I am carded due to a youthful appearance. As you gain more financial stability you are able to indulge in those things you could not afford in the lean years...and some people just have bad taste, or are making up for other things, besides lost youth, such as culture, status, economic standing. Not to mention it is the best apology a spouse can buy

2006-08-21 08:24:46 · answer #1 · answered by ladiileo 1 · 0 0

makeup has grow to be a rarity with me, yet once I opt for to do it, I take my time, via fact i've got considered an editorial online called How to no longer look As previous As you're. there are procedures and selections in that article that designate why new techniques could be put in place. all of it made experience, and that i've got replaced maximum of what i grow to be in a habit with. Ended up, particular adequate, looking greater advantageous. component of no longer having to artwork anymore, the place daily, those arrangements have been mandatory, going without is adequate of a luxurious that the undeniable-confronted result's properly worth it. A consultation on the conceit chair on the dressing table mirror taking my time includes approximately 40 5 minutes. intentionally sluggish. with regard to the hair, my suited shrink has slightly quirk to it, to maintain it severe on the crown. I tell my stylist i prefer to get out of the bathe, squeeze it dry, lean over from the waist with a blow-dryer, get up, and stroll out. Spritz it with shine, no longer something had to spray. yet i've got have been given to rubdown some gel into the roots fairly, in the previous drying, or i'm going to have a flat bowl shrink.

2016-11-05 07:50:40 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Maybe. It could be that they couldn't afford it when they were younger

2006-08-21 08:23:27 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

i just think they could be gypsies

2006-08-21 08:34:10 · answer #4 · answered by nicole 6 · 0 0

No, I don't think so...

2006-08-21 08:22:40 · answer #5 · answered by Sam 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers