I think it may be John Spenser comapring Hillary Clinton to Al Qadea.
Comparing ANYBODY who doesnt rave about Bush to Al Qadea?
Whing about moderates and liberals exercising first Ammendment rights?That's a big one.
Of course,these pro-war Republicans are so amoral,by my observations,they'll attck anything that stands in their way of power.
So much for the myth that only "CONservatives are patriotic".
2006-08-21
08:13:56
·
15 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Politics & Government
➔ Politics
As usual,conservatives take responsibilty for NOTHING AGAIN!
2006-08-21
08:23:46 ·
update #1
mymadsky-Republican shill! ANSWER the question JUST ONCE.
http://allhatnocattle.net/larry%20ann.jp...
2006-08-21
08:29:28 ·
update #2
It would have to be Cheney describing the vote against Lieberman as a help for Al-Queda. Amazing, people disagree with the administration...AGAIN! ...and they smear the people against them..AGAIN!
2006-08-21 10:38:33
·
answer #1
·
answered by Charlooch 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
How does John Spencer comparing Hillary to Al Qaeda even count as a smear campaign, since she is not running for anything this year and is not engaged in a campaign? That is obvious because the Clinton's have always run the dirtiest campaigns in history. There is no separating Hill from Bill because they ran together.
I assume you mean it attacks the general democratic party. The DNC is engaged in an all out war against Bush and all Bush supporters. The "conspiracy theories" we are all being subjected to are all a part of the DNC's campaign against the Republicans. To suggest that the office of the President took part in the planning and operational aspects of 9/11 is totally outrageous and renders the accusers beneath contempt.
Every time you see someone asking "Have you seen this?" or "Did you know this?" and links you to a consipiracy site they are either part of the plan or someone who has been duped into it through sheer naivety. Both parties have paid people working sites like Answers, the different blogs, My Space, etc. The DNC also has recruited the organized labor groups, such as the AFL-CIO and the NEA, to help "put the word out".
2006-08-21 08:39:31
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
for the comparable reason those closet totalitarians are hiding Dick Cheney and not making use of George W. Bush as a spokesman, they are protecting their failed, un-American and probable insane innovations off the campaign path as much as they'd, that is declared as "stealth and smear" campaigning. %. a conceivable looking no one with a narrow checklist whose innovations are extremist; and then spend a while slandering people who query that individual's psychological readiness, technology, checklist, stability, character and accomplishments. i wish their strategies are obtrusive to all human beings different than the corporate monopoly newstwisting professional-imperial-presidency varieties who positioned our fraudulent headlines and partisan neocon memories. If I have been president, they had no longer in basic terms lose the election, they'd lose their privilege of utilising grimy hints, lies, distortions, faked information pseudo-theocratic anti-technology, and unlawful assaults--they had the two 5 them up decrease than regulation of non-fiction or lose their citizenship. thank you for asking.
2016-12-17 14:51:58
·
answer #3
·
answered by schecter 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Actually arguing that a republican is in any way a viable candidate and equal in any form to any intelligent person running against them. Their very existence in the race is a smear tactic against the intelligence of everyone in the race with them.
2006-08-21 08:44:39
·
answer #4
·
answered by rmartin1978 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
And the DNC ad claiming Immigrants are terrorists????
Both parties sling mud, both will loss power this year and an Ind presidential candidate as a good shot at winning the election ( though will not get 270 electoral votes thus leaving the decision to congress)
2006-08-21 08:24:28
·
answer #5
·
answered by mymadsky 6
·
0⤊
3⤋
One might say that the war has converted one of President Bush's biggest lies into an unimaginably horrible truth: Iraq is now the epicenter of worldwide terrorism.
2006-08-21 08:24:56
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
That's funny with your little link posted there. Your liberal rant is ridiculous. Neither party is clean, and Hilary. If I believed in god. I would say she is the anti-Christ. She's as crooked as they come.
2006-08-21 08:41:02
·
answer #7
·
answered by BluntTrama 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I believe it to be the less overt smear of changing the name of something, and then calling it your own.
2006-08-21 08:30:25
·
answer #8
·
answered by hichefheidi 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Anything out of Dick Cheneys mouth.
2006-08-21 08:25:56
·
answer #9
·
answered by region50 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
Looks to me like YOU are into smear tactics.
2006-08-21 08:22:02
·
answer #10
·
answered by senior citizen 5
·
0⤊
1⤋